Just because you didn't understand my example as fitting the context of the discussion does not give you warrant to label it absolutely irrelevant. Ask clarifying questions before stooping to dismissiveness. The example is to show that the Greek culture, whatever was studied, could in all probability have come from secular, non-Christian usage, whether the culture to explain the statement, or the word use itself. You don't know actually how much bearing that has on what you are saying, but yet you jump to dismissiveness because you think I'm somehow a combatant for you. Greek scholarship has been precisely corrupted because of this point. They about 300 years ago started inter-mingling ancient Greek culture usage of words to be used in their lexicons. This slowly leaked in until it corrupted Biblical understanding of Greek words and terms. It's basically like they were giving the Greek text to a 1st century pagan to read and define how he thought it meant. I have studied much about textual criticism and their 'science'. A lot of fallacious reasoning underlies it.
