You’re drinking wine calm down lol.

Well duh, I know that. I'm arguing that even under an evolutionary worldview, all your decisions will still be linked to your past which chleb seems to be unaware.

or drive a car

you're thinking of it too technically

what's going on here

yo bois I'm back

only for like 2 minutes

hi

@Truthinker Dude, do you know what a reductio ad absurdum is?

reduce it to ridicule

LETS GO<:dogekek:726878872607653918>

What’s going on lmao

to who?

@Truthinker What I did with chleb is a reductio ad absurdum. I literally showed that even under his worldview, all he does is inherently absurd. How did you not see that? Lol

I like how the response is ...

Well you didn't school me because you literally mischaracterized my argumentation.

@Truthinker what's your standing? Atheist?

So no moral code?

why do you get to decide morality?

if you don't have an appeal to authority.

That is vicious circular reasoning. You cannot ground morality in yourself

i remember posting a meme like that at somepoint where the girls were labeled Trump vs Biden and the dude was labeled as Hunter Biden

very nice

i made it in 2 minutes while taking an english quiz

Darwinists make more sense than you.

Ok you clearly aren't well learned on epistemology.

thanks

false.

Important, yes.

i dont think theres a respected scientist who isnt a darwinist

So no scientists have moral codes?

when did i say that

im saying theres not a well respected scientist who doesnt belive in evolution

Okay I'd love to continue but I have a virtual class to attend so I prob can't keep up.

John Sanford, Robert Carter, Michael Behe are examples that don't believe in the neo-Darwinian paradigm.

I mean survival of the fittest.

do you think it is possible to be non-religous but moral

no

bye 4 now

religon forces you to confine to laws in order to feel comfort in death