The fluff isn’t bad

Everyone fluffs

By your definition, any metaphor is a fluff

So are you against figures of speech?

Either way

You still haven’t provided sufficient evidence

Just one clip that turns out to not even be in support of your claim

Like you can hate Trump, but you can’t say he’s a bad speaker when he speaks for hours on end and millions of people love listening to him

Fluff is bad

when you are the president of the united states

speaking on a global topic

that foreign government will most likley look at

They dont need to be told the size comparison of the world to the universe

They dont need to get told about bird grae yards.

*grave

Or how the volor of windmills is a problem.

*color

They need to hear his point, and his evidence backing it up

Thats all

He could have just said, I dont understand windmills.

In my opinion they cause more problems than they fix:

Some problems being:

They are produced by foreign companies, and I'd prefer if American companies produced them.

They have a major affect on bird poplations.

But that’s a drone way of thinking

They also lack centralization.

Trump has a way to convey information uniquely

Thats what foriegn governments want.

To hear.

Trump laid out the evidence

And his enemies to hear

He talked about birds dying

And how windmills look bad

And should be replaced

With a massive amount of unnecessary fluff.

So what

Why is fluff bad

Everyone fluffs

windmills bad me no like me angy "was his arguement

Turn that.

Make it an intelligent arguement.