> @Lady Perpetual Exemption yes but the point he’s making is that public healthcare almost eliminates insurance to the point where the government decides who gets treatment based of importance
It doesn't really. The idea is that government health care would be better than the insurance that they already get

Let's treat the abortion subject on a case-to-case scenario. Period.

> That wasn't your point at all, you just completely changed your stance.
@Lady Perpetual Exemption No, I didn’t. Insurance is a symptom of government interference in health care. Therefore I don’t want the government taking over insurance as well.

We need to send feminists to the Middle East to fix the inequality problem <:KEK:726877368601411624> <:KEK:726877368601411624>

banning guns wont necissarily make gun related fatalities lower

i'm a libertarian and i don't care about what woman choses to do or not to do with their body.

but it will make gun related suiceides less

feminists will love the middle east

> banning guns wont necissarily make gun related fatalities lower
@PROPHET higher, actually.

no

> i'm a libertarian and i don't care about what woman choses to do or not to do with their body.
@jabilson epic! Awesome! Amazing!

Four more days for four more years!

4 days 4 4 years!

@LuckyPuffy The band RUSH made a very good point about that:
"If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice!"

^

Bingo!

> Let's treat the abortion subject on a case-to-case scenario. Period.
@LuckyPuffy Agreed.

i don't feel good regarding abortions but i don't think the govt should ban them from woman who choses it. It's a public/woman's health issue and very personal. I want woman to have control of their own lives, not the government telling her what to do or not to do with her body

hmm

can u give me a study on how removing guns will increse gun related fatalities

> @Lady Perpetual Exemption No, I didn’t. Insurance is a symptom of government interference in health care. Therefore I don’t want the government taking over insurance as well.
And you just changed it again...

And based on your logic... you don't want insurance at all? I'm sure it's just bad wording, but what you said doesn't make sense

or is that an anecdote

except now the human life (the child) is being murdered

yeah it's a self ethical issue not a national issue

it's up to you

> can u give me a study on how removing guns will increse gun related fatalities
@PROPHET Sure, Nazi Germany is a wonderful case study.

abortion is something i'm very passionate about. for somebody to kill another human being simply because they refuse to take responsibility for their actions....

In cases of rape, or incest, I'd say it should be legal.
Perhaps also if the woman's life was in danger.
Other than that, I'd say it should not be.

nah

in rape what did the child do to be murdered

why tho prism

that's dumb

2 wrongs dont make a right

A middleground must be struck to move forward. we cannot gain the whole battlefield all at once.

you accidentally get preg and now you have to raise a child

welp

thats your fault

Remember to keep this conversation civil. 🙂

if you have sex you'd better be able to raise that child

no

yep