it's an internet law that

Section 230 generally provides immunity for website publishers from third-party content.

protects twitter

and facebook

from being cringe

We should keep that

They're both cringe

nope

protects Twitter from being nuked because they put a “official sources have called the election for quid pro Joe”

allows twitter and FB to censor what they deem "unpatriotic" ?

big tech is so biased man I think it’s gotta go

quid pro Joe .... 🤣

^

shit is NOT based.

It would be better interpreted as not holding twitter and Facebook directly liable for content that may be illegal on them, if it’s posted by users

lol who cares about Cali

So you can have your fan arts and fan fictions

Don't British people love saying ello govenor?

couldn’t walk 2 blocks without seeing a syringe in California

besides it's our own fault we started the fires, well that and Antifa

I have a question

Removing section 230 would make internet censorship more common

I say red lives matter

how is providing EVIDENCE a conspiracy theory

"there is no russian collusion" is a conspiracy theory according to Biden supporters

Also, as a Californian, I care about California

I say pink lives matter for breast cancer awareness

As a California resident

I don't

Why not

kinda fucking hilarious

conspiracy theory 😂

Shouldn’t you care about what goes on in your state

Cali sucks harder than Kamala trying to get a promotion that's why

california is basically heaven for rich ass people

Then care about making it better

@Hank The The that's a hard succ

“Guys there’s no evidence my anti-trump media bubble said so”

Absolutely not

Kamala is a man

EXTREME SUCC