the campaign team was not concerned with where the money came from at all, which is already a big red flag. If they were moral concerned, they wouldve checked.
A straw man is a form of argument and an informal fallacy of having the impression of refuting an argument, whereas the proper idea of argument under discussion was not addressed or properly refuted. One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man"
But this GSA tbh wasn’t political at all. We really just had picnics, PowerPoint about the LGBT community (I learned a lot), and even did debate the youth club once.
You can’t check every check. Campaigns get hundreds or thousands of checks daily from random people or organizations. They can’t do a background check on each one, it would eat up all the money they’re getting in.
GSA is just as useless as BLM. If you want to treat gay people like people, then do so, but treating them like glass that needs protection defeats the whole purpose of equal rights
And let's be honest, if we were lefties we'd all scream blm to get black votes and when their candidate wins we'll all let the shit we're "fighting"for go and i have to give to them they're good in deceiving ppl
Gay people aren't being treated poorly in the south. I would know because I live here. Disagreement isn't oppression. And once again, if they want to be treated equally, they need to learn to take any heat they get like the rest of us have to.
