still

if the convo's about [for example] foreign policy

that's a good argument to make.

and they throw you that sideball

just ignore it

what if the talk is about first ladies?

So what if she was almost nude? She came from a country where that is not a big deal.

i'd just say, "who gives a shit?"

It is not like she did porn

> So what if she was almost nude? She came from a country where that is not a big deal.
@Vinz Clortho no the arguement is that she's a nudist artist

but that among all the first ladies

she's the one who have the filthiest job so to speak.

IMO a lawyers is the filthiest job

You sell your soul to win

If she isn't doing hard core what does it matter?

@HarleyQuinn again, i see it as a distraction to prevent them to arguing matters of importance

I am reminded when they said that Grace Jones was posing nude. And I thought that is something I don't want to see.

so it's a non winnable argument?

> your president is creating peace in the middle east?

> well--- uh -- his wife's a whore!!1!

It's a What does it matter

hahaha

@Vinz Clortho exactly

the dude's an asshole

and i love it

Because you can have all the information you need and share it. They won't care.

so just prevent it?

the left always go for strawman arguments

cause i really can't argue with that

again

i can see a substance argument for it.

they usually pull that to steer away from the convo

i mean

like i said

the convo started at first ladies./

dude

i don't think that [no offense]

anyone's gonna be talking about first ladies

in this point in time

that would've been conversations back in like 2015-16

ok ok