it could just be some technical difficulties idk

senior

generally debating Teachers and Students isnt worth it

to be fair, it could be everyone struggling to connect

but idk, the class has been on for 30m and nothing

Well either way no class! Ayeee

nvm

some other kid just posted about the same issue

still stupid tho

When I used to debate teacher all the students went you are stupid beacuse what a teacher says obviously is right

public school sucks

nah but I flamed kids hold on

lemme pull up the shit I wrote

im actually in the zoom now

most students arent intellectuals either

Keep callin em our

Out*

lol

ikr

Well most people don’t realize that the world is gumdrops and marshmallows

Isnt*

lol

your average teen supports climate change and more ecological awereness

also is for more immigration

```
If a visitor came to the United States today to examine the so-called democracy that we find ourselves in, they would likely be disappointed. Living in a state of chaos, many citizens of the United States, if asked, would be hesitant to even put the label “democratic” on the society we have created for ourselves, potentially due to the lack of Human Rights among certain, specific demographics, or due to the way in which the government combats issues of humanity, such as mass migration and climate change. Perhaps the most significant change that has taken place for our democracy in recent history has to do with the separation of church and state, a separation whose line has become blurred when considering legislation that infringes upon religious rights and religious rights that infringe upon legislation.
```

heres what they wrote

lol

anti-american bullshit

here was my response lol

```
Although I agree with the fundamentals behind your argument, arguing for stronger enforcement of the constitution, I think it is important to apply the interpretation of the constitution equally across all Amendments. I appreciate your argument involving interpretation of the constitution, but the rhetoric of the constitution does not explicitly specify that the 2nd Amendment applies to foreign affairs, and to jump to such a conclusion is dangerous. furthermore, I did not see any citations or specifics regarding your claim that America has a "lack of human rights". The Muslim Ban was introduced as a way to promote national security interests, at the expense of travel to and from the Islamic countries. I would challenge the idea that traveling to and from the United States is a "basic human right". The rhetoric you chose to describe the "Muslim being terrorists" is a clear example of a reduction fallacy, where you disingenuously attempt to discredit the President's rhetoric in the interests of promoting the idea that the Executive Action is racist.
```

<:benshapirolasereyes:736783642205880320>

I whiffed there with my paraphrased "muslim being terrorists" tho

bruh they dont seem to understand what separation between church and state is lol

lol

ikr

later in their argument

they say that trump is not separating church and state cuz of anti abortion

```
r. He therefore refused to acknowledge the valued separation of church and state for the sake of a broad generalization about Muslims being terrorists. Furthermore, the lack of separation between church and state can be explored through the angle of “pro-life,” a popular Christian movement in America that advocates for legislation banning abortions. Many conservative politicians have joined the movement, bringing these Christian ideals to American government, successfully passing anti-abortion legislation in many states. These laws, while signed rather democratically, have undemocratic undertones, continuing to erase the line between church and state, arguably one of the greatest strengths of our democracy. While the backbone of our nation is somewhat of a democracy, it is the way the game is played, the manipulation of the government through political schemes, that would concern a visitor to the United States, swaying them away from the belief that democracy lives on here.

```

Laws that the Church supports doesnt mean the church has governing power

```
As for your argument regarding "pro-life" being a predominantly Christian movement, I would challenge you to consider the notion that "pro-life" is merely an interpretation of when life begins, and not a religious phenomena. The government has a responsibility to protect a vulnerable subset of the population, and this interpretation brings to light a interpretation in which the fetus in the woman is a life.
```

that was my response lol