communism defined by karl marx himself is a cashless, stateless and classless society

can u seriously say that china is stateless lol

The state sometimes intercepts what goes on with the chinese citizens.

it's a dictatorship

it's highly authoritarian

And totalitarian

no it's not even 'sometimes'

plus it's not cashless

All I'm saying is china is slowly putting free market in their economy

there's no need to define it into a particular category, it's an authoritarian dictatorship controlled by quasi oligarchs

in order to achieve a cashless society, the produce would be need to be created by machinery entirely

My opponent is a liar and he cannot be trusted <:dogekek:726878872607653918>

there would be no workers

They have been thriving because of their great trade deals.

AI would have to manage manufacturers

communism has never been achieved

They puts tarriffs on alot of places and also have lots of resources within the country.

next question:

No system is fully communist, socialist. Not even america is fully capitalist

why did venezeula, cuba, late soviet union and other countries fail with socialism

America hasn't been capitalist for a long time lol

^

bingo

lol

Government control?

ok but before we get to that

no no

hold it

China is capitalist y’all idiots

> why did venezeula, cuba, late soviet union and other countries fail with socialism

But people have argued demsoc has workes

Such as Norwey

Lmao, I said that donald.

Norway and Denmark are more capitalist than the USA is, they jsut have high taxes

Yes ik

bros, who's gonna answer my question

It's a mixed economy

it's not mixed, it's just a capitalist dictatorship

the government controls most of the economy

It's getting a little early for trivia.

Maybe if there are less people.