Message from @Steinkrieg

Discord ID: 776192319942033409


2020-11-11 21:07:04 UTC  

Just the ones invalidating votes

2020-11-11 21:07:14 UTC  

Which is a much lower burden of proof

2020-11-11 21:07:35 UTC  

Hearsay isn't enough...
Which rn (at least that ik) is all that they have.
"I heard a guy say he was doing this" or "I heard a guy tell a guy to do that"

2020-11-11 21:07:44 UTC  

That isnt hearsay

2020-11-11 21:07:51 UTC  

It literally is

2020-11-11 21:07:52 UTC  

Its a first hand source

2020-11-11 21:08:04 UTC  

Hearsay is when you speak for someone else

2020-11-11 21:08:20 UTC  

Like if I say rags said something

2020-11-11 21:08:26 UTC  

Thats hearsay

2020-11-11 21:08:36 UTC  

hearsay is me saying I heard Ehzek say that he saw Orwell likes the peepee in the buttbutt

2020-11-11 21:08:42 UTC  

But if I say me and rags did something that isnt hearsay

2020-11-11 21:08:44 UTC  

> Like if I say rags said something
That's what I said...
@Ehzek

2020-11-11 21:08:53 UTC  

No it isnt

2020-11-11 21:09:05 UTC  

That would be me being a whistle blower

2020-11-11 21:09:07 UTC  

> But if I say me and rags did something that isnt hearsay
Name the guy who said "I did this" so I can check it out
@Ehzek

2020-11-11 21:09:13 UTC  

Which you said is hearsay

2020-11-11 21:09:24 UTC  

Ask rudy

2020-11-11 21:10:11 UTC  

Its an ongoing investigation you arent getting court statements now retard

2020-11-11 21:10:55 UTC  

and those court docs will most likely be sealed or redacted for the protection of the whistle blowers

2020-11-11 21:11:05 UTC  

Yep

2020-11-11 21:11:10 UTC  

so GL finding out about them

2020-11-11 21:11:17 UTC  

I mean

2020-11-11 21:11:33 UTC  

If something happens because of them they are obviously real

2020-11-11 21:11:33 UTC  

> That would be me being a whistle blower
The current "whistleblowers" are ALL hearsay... Whatever you want to call them. There is no one who's been released publicly that has admitted to actually doing it themselves. This is speculation on your part, either that or you're regurgitating what you've heard others say
@Ehzek

2020-11-11 21:11:44 UTC  

No they arent

2020-11-11 21:12:05 UTC  

No one who is in the conspiracy is public

2020-11-11 21:12:07 UTC  

Eye witness testimony is not hearsay

2020-11-11 21:12:08 UTC  

Period

2020-11-11 21:12:22 UTC  

> He probably needs witsec
You think this'll save him lol
@Ragnarok

2020-11-11 21:12:51 UTC  

> Its an ongoing investigation you arent getting court statements now retard
Exactly. So you're speculating
@Ehzek

2020-11-11 21:13:06 UTC  

No

2020-11-11 21:13:23 UTC  

You are and you dont even know what you are talking about

2020-11-11 21:13:24 UTC  

> Eye witness testimony is not hearsay
We've already agreed that this hasn't been released.
@Steinkrieg

2020-11-11 21:13:50 UTC  

You are just arguing about shit with 0 experience on your part

2020-11-11 21:14:08 UTC  

You're projecting

2020-11-11 21:14:16 UTC  

Low self awareness

2020-11-11 21:15:10 UTC  

You didn't even know most people plead guilty...

2020-11-11 21:15:11 UTC  

> Hearsay is enough, there are more exceptions than not for hearsay, and it can be introduced in a probable cause hearing without the "hearsayer" present
@Ragnarok grand juries also

2020-11-11 21:16:04 UTC  

Whistle blowers by and large are eye witnesses to wrong doing

2020-11-11 21:16:05 UTC  

Only associates

2020-11-11 21:16:14 UTC  

> You didn't even know most people plead guilty...
Nothing you say is accurate
@Ehzek