Message from @Valor Reborn

Discord ID: 747905311607750666


2020-08-25 19:45:56 UTC  

I didn't know Asiatics had red hair.

2020-08-25 19:46:01 UTC  

they beleive he was a redhead

2020-08-25 19:46:04 UTC  

He was.

2020-08-25 19:46:09 UTC  

yea the chaldeans have the red hair gene

2020-08-25 19:46:23 UTC  

for the asiatics the chaldean/arphachsad branch have the red hair gene

2020-08-25 19:46:37 UTC  

for the whites.Japhethites Tiras had the redhead gene

2020-08-25 19:46:53 UTC  

even the ancient pagans note this shit

2020-08-25 19:47:05 UTC  

So, you think two completely different peoples "evolved" the same gene?

2020-08-25 19:47:09 UTC  

Couldn't be conquest and ad-mixture?

2020-08-25 19:47:11 UTC  

but you know don't let it get in the way of the confusion of the atheists that lived in the last century

2020-08-25 19:47:22 UTC  

It may surprise you that the ruling class for much of the classical world were Indo-European.

2020-08-25 19:47:30 UTC  

From Iberia to Babylon.

2020-08-25 19:47:36 UTC  

it's unlikely because the conquest and mixing came after muhammad

2020-08-25 19:47:38 UTC  

Don't conflate the ruling class with the peasants.

2020-08-25 19:47:50 UTC  

Then they were Indo-European, ruling over others.

2020-08-25 19:48:02 UTC  

Did you know Ghengis Khan had red hair?

2020-08-25 19:48:09 UTC  

there is no indo-european, that's jsut a lie the atheists made up last century

2020-08-25 19:48:14 UTC  

Let me guess, he's just an Asian guy with the red hair gene too?

2020-08-25 19:48:31 UTC  

yea genghis khan be from arphachsad's line

2020-08-25 19:48:33 UTC  

Egyptian Pharoes were Arab too, bro.

2020-08-25 19:48:41 UTC  

Alexander the Great was a Turk.

2020-08-25 19:48:43 UTC  

etc.

2020-08-25 19:48:48 UTC  

arphachsad is the largest of all the subraces, the grandsons of Noah

2020-08-25 19:49:08 UTC  

You are pro-white but are content with blackwashing our history.

2020-08-25 19:49:09 UTC  

no Alexander the Great was a Javanite, a Japhethite

2020-08-25 19:49:10 UTC  

Interesting.

2020-08-25 19:49:39 UTC  

So Whites were just backwater vikings until the blessings of Christianity?

2020-08-25 19:49:41 UTC  

the turkic peopels are asiatic semites, also from the line of arphachsad

2020-08-25 19:49:55 UTC  

they came into turkey like in the medieval time

2020-08-25 19:49:59 UTC  

Wow.

2020-08-25 19:50:12 UTC  

Why even bother being pro-white when you still fall for the fiction.

2020-08-25 19:50:31 UTC  

the vikings are likely to be Magog, a son of Japheth

2020-08-25 19:50:50 UTC  

So this ... is the power of Biblical Literalism.

2020-08-25 19:51:12 UTC  

not jsut the bible, the ancient pagans knew it too, hence naming a lot of shit after themselves

2020-08-25 19:51:24 UTC  

Spare me on what you think "Pagans" were about.

2020-08-25 19:51:39 UTC  

for instance the ancient greks were called by other "yavanaman" literalyl Javan's sons (javan is pronounced as yavan)

2020-08-25 19:52:18 UTC  

assyrians, a semitic people = ltieralyl Asshur's sons

2020-08-25 19:53:09 UTC  

the blatts they named africa after their father khem, they caleld it kemet, literally land of Khem (for bonus points his name means to be black, literally ta meri kemet = blessed land of the blacks or blessed land of khem)

2020-08-25 19:54:55 UTC  

the fictional view of race is rather the modernistic atheistic view because the atheists are fucking stupid and literally wrong pretty much about everything they touch. And they're not even that old themselves, their atheist fairytales came about last century

2020-08-25 19:59:57 UTC  

i also think it's kind of psychological, you figure most of the generation of whores and bastards today don't know who their immediate fathers are, so it makes sense they don't really know who the Patriarchs (fathers) of the races are and so they kinda conflate and cling to a whole bunch of nonsense

2020-08-25 20:00:41 UTC  

bastards are a pretty easy prey to all sorts of lies