Message from @Maw
Discord ID: 777311554055962654
That's not going to help anyone.
It's especially not going to help the northwest and northeast of the states.
Who have millions of workers that work in Canada.
We also have zero proof that they have influence from the Canadian government.
These machines are undoubtedly vetted by Americans.
You're starting to bark up the really big conspiracy tree.
And painting yourself into an isolated corner where you alienate every other country because you suspect them of something.
"Days after it was revealed how 2020 US Elections were rigged by Canadian Crown Agent Dominion Voting Systems through a so-called “glitch” [...]" This sounds like an unbiased news source.
Does that negate the fact that votes were counted in spain?
And by a spanish company
And a canadian company?
Well, for one: There exists no proof for the opening statement, so it colours my perspective highly skeptical to say the least.
> Well, for one: There exists no proof for the opening statement, so it colours my perspective highly skeptical to say the least.
@Maw
As far as you know there exists no proof. The writer might know that there exists proof, or he might analytically have determined that the number of irregularities is beyond reasonable doubt.
I believe that all of the glitches have been in Biden's favor, not sure..
Yes, as far as I know there exists no proof that Americans were niave enough to allow rigged software to be used in their elections and didn't vet these machines, and that it was intentionally done by a Canadian company, who apparently also has influences from the Canadian government that wished these systems to be rigged.
Therefore I think it's ridiculous.
Occam's razor.
> Yes, as far as I know there exists no proof that Americans were niave enough to allow rigged software to be used in their elections and didn't vet these machines, and that it was intentionally done by a Canadian company, who apparently also has influences from the Canadian government that wished these systems to be rigged.
@Maw
Texas rejected the software because of its lack of security I believe.
I wish I had your optimism about the naive or corrupt nature of American politicians and voting software decision makers
Politicians aren't programmers.
The people that vet software and machines are generally engineers and programmers that are a third party.
And a "lack of security" isn't the same as "intentionally committing fraud"
> The people that vet software and machines are generally engineers and programmers that are a third party.
@Maw No, the QA teams usually have no idea about software development.
According to?
Me
A software developer
I too am a software developer!
Do you work for the US government?
Then you should know no developers wants to be in QA
And most QA people have no fucking idea about how the software works
I'm sure the vetting of machines like this are done far more in-depth than just QA teams.
It's election systems.
I find it hard to believe that the government would be this careless.
After the last 20 years.
And after 2016.
Then you must have never worked for goverment contractirs lol
Nope.
I sort of make it a point not to, because they don't tend to pay as well.
My friend worked for a defense contractor and youd be surprised.
Defense is a bit different.
Same shit, tanks and misiles.