not having a polling place is pretty far from equal treatment

walmart is fine but voting is no go, pretty sad

Personally, I think it would be a wasted effort because not having a polling location in itself doesn't mean fraud. Does it disincentivize? I don't know, I'm not a behavioral psychologist. Does it present an easier platform for fraud, absolutely.

to me its like they failed to do their duty and have an election, why dont we just all vote online, im sure that coming

I agree.

here casinos and bars and strip clubs are open, but not public schools or many churches, totally insane

its idiocracy

What's stupid is we normally vote at a veterans museum and in 2016 to vote it was set where nobody is ever within 6 feet anyway. It was the most awkward 100 ft walk, pale walls, very horror movie-like with a table at the end and two people sitting silently making zero facial expressions or really even acknowledging your existence like my life is about to be judged. (2016) 😂

So it didn't need to be closed.
Oh well. Better luck next time.

its scary what ppl will accept

https://youtu.be/rdrKCilEhC0

some are saying revolution 2.0, never gonna happen lol

Obedience experiment during the time of the Nuremberg trials.

my relative was a prosecutor at Nuremberg

https://www.theepochtimes.com/2020-election-investigation-who-is-stealing-america_3617562.html?utm_source=parler

a documentary worth watching

https://youtu.be/iFd3IszXd8g

wild

Well, knew this would be coming.

NO

Not not now, not maybe later. Never. You stupid phone.

Yep I got that notification

Absolutely not

That will be non-optional shortly amd is likely tracking under "anonymity" for internal data.

Such an eye opening study, I researched this in psychology and was both shocked and not at the same time if that makes sense

My assumption

I don't believe I would have done it. But I'm sure there is a variable that going into the video watching it already presents a bias outside the scope of the study. Has to be fully blind to the person actually making the decision.

I still don't think I would have done it.

That was the thing on why it would be unethical by today's standards is that the participants were not fully informed, but at the time they had to be

Had to be that way.

Otherwise its already a tampered result.

If he were to ask if they would do such a thing they would all say no absolutely not I would never deliver lethal shocks to another person

You'd know better.

Not even if I was told to

But from a psychological perspective the study proved that the use of the"scientist" figure allowed the participant to feel almost no guilt

yeah no way, but its scary

"Well it wasn't me doing this, I was just doing what I was told, he told me they would be fine"

I wear a mask because I don't find it morally compromising. But I do find it disturbing with the goal post moving because accept one thing then the next and next and next.

80% went all the way to the end of it

And that's how they get ya

@Discopainter, you just advanced to level 5!