Sometimes it's better to let things go, and fix the issues for the future.

A 68% “error” rate vs the allowable limit of 0.0008%

And 82% rejection rate

For the first time, adjudication logs have been deleted

It’s certainly a red flag. Nothing normal about that.

They are doing a hand count starting tomorrow and we'll know in a few days. "This week the Michigan Bureau of Elections and Antrim County will also be conducting a hand tally of all ballots cast in the presidential election in Antrim County, which will provide further verification that the Antrim County results are accurate."

That audit is set to begin Thursday, officials said. https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/12/14/michigan-company-officials-dispute-report-antrim-county-voting/6538325002/

by an auditor that said the system was setup for ranked-choice voting and that's not true in MI

Again, flipping the results after this long would look so bad, it would cause irreparable harm to the GOP.

Believe me, if you care about your side at all, you don't want them to suddenly flip.

A criminal is not going to say, you got me guys, we committed fraud.

There will be denial.

By default.

No, it would cause harm to the DNC for perpetrating it.

Usually you're supposed to take the path of Occam's Razor or Hanlon's Razor, and not jump to "he's just a criminal, lol"

Correct aoh

Occam’s Razor is not a law.

I think you're missing the point.

And by the way?

The legal system does revolve around Hanlon's Razor and Occam's Razor, basically.

You're innocent until proven guilty.

There is tons of proof of fraud

A simple explanation is not always the explanation.

Truth is stranger than fiction.

You're acting in good faith, or you're proven to be acting in bad faith.

This is how the legal system works, like it or not.

read all about the county's response and Dominion CEO's response here: https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/12/15/dominion-voting-ceo-antrim-county/3906017001/

So yes, Hanlon's Razor and Occam's razor is a very, very valid point.

Again, no CEO is going to admit to criminal wrongdoing in public.

Cool.

Not really.

You're talking about an auditor.

Talking about the CEO — not an auditor.

Have you proven criminal intent? Have you proven criminal action took place?

hand recount will show who is telling the truth

““Russell James Ramsland, Jr. and his team at ASOG have the cybersecurity and forensic capabilities and expertise that cannot be dismissed. In fact, looking at their team, their patents, their experience, we now have a credible analysis that as I predicted, the Algorithms being used in the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed to create systematic fraud and influence election results and in this case, not in the favor of President Trump,” said Gary Miliefsky, a founding member of the US Department of Homeland Security and publisher of Cyber Defense Magazine.”

Do you even have sufficient evidence that this person in particular is even under probable cause-levels of suspicion (some of the least strict evidence you can find)

Cool.

We're talking about an auditor.

There is plenty of evidence of fraud

Which auditor? Lol.

Who you just completely dismissed because you presume he's a criminal.