Message from @Aerione
Discord ID: 195467528301051904
Nope
Unless Samsungs count as one
hmm think I can be ok without it
just want it to be 1440p, IPS
There's this, supposedly
overkill monitor
Naaaaa
i dont need 4k
Just sit further away :^)
And well
3 years ago, when I got my 1440p, people were like "Naah, I don't need 2K"
Look at them now
im on 1080p lol
60hz
I found a really good deal but I won't say what it is because I want it
I only want a 144hz, ips and 1440p
then im happy
I'm fine with my 1920x1200 60hz tbh.
I wouldn't mind 1440p, but I don't really feel like I need it.
If you're ok with 120hz without syncing, then a Qnix will do you fine
I can't go back to 1080p on anything larger than 21"
It feels kinda blurry
On the other hand, 450 PPI and that shit on phones is quite overkill
I think that those phone resolutions are stupid.
I mean, why would I want 1440p on my phone, when my 24" screen don't even have that resolution?
I feel the sweetspot is 300 PPI
Anything further is better spent on increasing the quality of the screen itself
I feel like what Apple is doing in terms of resolution on their phones is good.
The resolution isn't stupidly high on my iPhone 5, but it looks great.
720 is kinda poor on a 5 incher, though
I mean, it was nice when it ran with a 4"
900 would be what it needs to keep parity, at the very least
Or wait
It's less than 720. The resolution is 1136 x 640.
However, you just said that 300 PPI is the sweet spot. iPhone 5 is 326.
Yea, it's at 620p
Well, that's what I prefer from a battery perspective
But there's more to grab, if they want actual visual parity
It was their pitch with the 4, after all
Also, the iPhone 5 isn't 5". It's 4", so that explains something, I guess.
Either way, 538 PPI is overkill, like on my LG G4.
new review time