Message from @oMerric
Discord ID: 578019616597737503
I'm only finding one thing about it
thx
its happened a lot throughout history
dont worry they have a magical excuse for it
Ahh
so ur in the clear
more globe magic
That article explains how it was possible
yes i know magic
Atmospheric refraction
yes
not magic
maybe maybe not
lets think about it
Atmospheric refraction is like when you put a stick in water and it looks like it's in a different place in the water, right? (If you get what I mean)
You realize that lunar eclipses can only be accurately predicted with a globe model, right?
the sun moon and earth are supposed to be in a straight line for a lunar eclipse but we can see the sun and moon in the sky so atmospheric refraction is taking the sun 90 degrees out of where it really is ?
PicklePot I guess
atmospheric refraction is moving the sun thousands of miles
The light from the sun is being refracted so it looks displaced, although physically it is still behind the moon
magic
the sun is not behind the moon in a lunar eclipse
Light moves differently through gravity and space too
its supposed to be on th e opposite side of earth not behind the moon
jeremy is just going to claim gravity is only a theory
ur getting solar and lunar eclipse mied up
mixed u
up
Yeah my bad
What I said still holds true tho
Light moves differently through an atmosphere than empty space
so u have the sun the earth then the moon in a straight line but atmospheric refraction makes the sun move 90 degrees at least which is thoussnds of miles it sounds magical
Like my water example I used earlier
jeremy, please read the article
ive heard all the magical globe excuses
The irony.
It doesn't "move" the sun. The light from the sun is displaced by the atmosphere so it seems as if it is shifted.
so i can see the sun and moon in the sky but its not moving the sun ?