if done many of these I tell ya...

Then a denser object with less mass

Gravity wise

yeah I get that

And the mass is used to calculate the weight not the density

and if you operate underwater objects behave different again

Fun fact about water

because it's object vs surrounding, no magical centre force pull needed

There’s a pressure gradiant and a density gradiant

Only the pressure gradiant goes all the way to the bottom and the density gradiant stops at -1000 feet

After that its the same density all the way to the bottom

But the pressure still increases because of the weight

my iq can't handle that, I just don't see a curve and roll with it

Lol okay

but hey, have fun debating flattards, always interesting

So if you see a curve then you’re convinced then

yup

A curve left to right or curving away from you?

I mean there’s so much to find

if we where on a sphere, we would have some decent photos already, not the photoshopped ones

or Livestream without fisheye lenses

Would you accept a high altitude balloon footage?

From ground to sky

With no fisheye lens

yup, it's always straight 30 miles up

Brb

dude it's straight 300 miles up..

and don't give me a vid like the Sunrays ones... don't like another visual argument...

https://i.imgur.com/OSbXnt8.gif these are some snapshots of it. I can’t post any pictures but look up “lensdistortion” you have barreldistortion and pincushion distortion. And the way to detect this is watching the horizon go up and down in the frame. If the horizon changes shape its a fisheyelens. It the horizon stay the same both above and below the center of frame its not distorted. And here the full raw unedited video. You can see the horizon looks flat from the ground and starts to curve ever so slightly as it goes up https://youtu.be/2RATP53l9MA

Mind you this is from a flat earther.

see, most seem flat too me

Yeah you’re not expecting to see much curve to begin with the earth is gigantic

You really have to look or in this case compare it to a straight line

and in the last vid the Earth was concaved with the wobble..

still a distorted lens

When it’s wobbling really hard that’s just the camera not being able to process the image

Look when its more stable but still wobbling up and down

Then you don’t see any change

what about the pictures of beyondhorizons.eu or the cities photographed while it supposed to be meters under the horizon

Math says its not a globe

Unless you assume it is and add your mirage math