Message from @bwizdam
Discord ID: 581170616552652820
That's the definition of Newtonian gravity. In General Relativity, it's the curvature of spacetime.
why would you feel any of that?
True, i guess
and I believe the Cavendish experiment proves at least a gravitational constant.
so saying "it's never been scientifically proven to exist" is bunk.
It never has been proven you silly people.
If you don’t pass the scientific method, you do not possess proof.
And you don’t.
Actually, I take it back. it hasn't been *proven*. But in science, nothing is every proven. Only disproven.
In science nothing is ever proven, only disproven? So.. How is it possible to disprove what has never been proven? Do you hear yourself?
And general relativity works *incredibly well* under most applications. Falls apart in quantum theory, though.
I didn't come up with that, Derkek. That's the scientific method.
who wants to debate in vc?
You need proof to debate.
Since none of you have any, you’re incapable of debate.
uh-huh
So that's no?
As I said, you don’t have any proof. You can’t debate.
not exactly *civil* debate, is it?
Where’s your proof that passes the scientific method?
If you don’t have any, then stop making me repeat myself.
You literally have Zero proof, shadow.
True Baka - Gaijin xD
We are here in VC if you decide to be an adult
vacuum chambers easily disprove the air density theory.
@Drewski4343 go on...
in a vacuum, objects fall at the same speed.
yes because air resistance isnt a factor
Go ahead.
Say gravity again.
exactly. there's no air to affect the "air density" part.
Where is the vacuum seal?
Do you understand English?