Of

https://youtu.be/P52t4gt1FxI

The Axis of Evil is a cool subject. Do you read any Robert Sungenis, Derek?

I’ve heard of him, yes. He is a geocentrist, and was responsible for the documentary, ‘The Principle’.

How he could still believe the earth is round, despite irrefutable proof it’s level literally everywhere, is rather baffling.

That's right. He uses the Axis of Evil as the main scientific evidence for a geocentric universe.

He told me exactly why he believes it's a globe.

Two celestial poles.

A lot of people make that mistake.

my bad, not Sungenis, but his cohort Rick Delano.

When it’s provable the earth beneath our feet is level, nothing will change that by pointing away from the earth.

by pointing away?

looking at the stars?

By pointing at stars. Yes.

the two celestial poles is actually *extremely* compelling evidence for a globe earth.

They don’t change the shape of the earth beneath our feet because our understanding can’t comprehend their operation.

the way the stars move is completely predicted by the globe earth model and... really bizarre on the flat earth model.

Stars have been predictable using a flat geocentric earth since forever.

It’s the shape of the celestial that’s different.

using a flat tool doesn't = the sky is flat.

the sky spins in two separate directions.

You mean the celestial.

The sky is underneath that.

yes, the celestial poles.

https://media.tenor.com/images/ad64e01c4d34eaee7fc5eb5ba2fac756/tenor.gif

oops, yes, the stars, not the sky.

I’m telling you, the celestial movement is not a means that would change the shape of the earth beneath us.

why is that?

That would be like saying mirrors above us that reflect lights in different fashions changes the shape of a flat floor beneath our feet.

That’s silly.

if the earth were a globe, spinning in space, we would see the "apparent" movement of the stars above us. The stars themselves aren't moving, but it appears they are to us as we move with the earth. The movement of the stars is perfectly explained by the globe earth model - the two celestial poles are the axis of rotation represented in the sky.

It’s not perfectly explained when the earth isn’t moving in the first place.

on one model, the movement of the stars is 100% supported and explained. On the other, it's a weird, bi-directional swirl.

according to the globe earth model, it is indeed 100% explained.

In theory. But when they can’t prove earth movement, that’s like missing concrete in the foundation of a house.

The above gif I posted was a simulation I did in After Effects of a uniform sky and a spinning earth with the camera locked to it.

https://youtu.be/60lGDvOuw9M

That’s a 4 minute video.

Just look at it.

I'll check it out.