Its taboo

@nestea can here you go

http://makerhive.proboards.com/thread/2023/dr-kei-moris-tomato-plant

He injected co2 directly into the tomato stem

And added a uv filter above it

The tomato plant doesnt die

so far every souce I've found seems to be biased

And your sources are unbiased?

what sources are you talking about

also ad hominem

Huh?

A question is an ad hominem?

Citizen Z Today at 10:10 PM
And your sources are unbiased?

I know I won't win this argument as you're the admin though

K. Believe what you wish. I think it's funny somewhere in the world you walk around an ignorant fool

@nestea can that’s not an adhominem

define an ad hominem

Biased sources or unbiased sources

It only depends if they are credible to what they claim

so far both websites are christian

Appeal to ignorance much?

one believes in the great flood

Credible meaning proof to whatever they are talking about, it being confirmed, etc

the other believes dinosaurs coexisted with early man

There is evidence there was a great deluge

There is footprints of humans found along side giant lizard prints

so flintstones I guess

Apparently lol

In your mind

Ad hominem

that's not an ad hominem

What is then?

How do you know those footprints are human footprints?

Or from what you are reading states that

🙄

something that detracts from the argument by insulting the opponent

Am I misunderstood that flat earthers don't believe in dinosaurs?

I've not met one yet that actually has an interest in the subject

Some do, some don't, they don't all agree

carbon dating doesn't register anything past the extinction event

Unless you are different which does excite me a bit @Citizen Z

avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.