avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.

i can see you had to look that up

nice

You are not attacking the argument

You are declaring it a cartoon

Ad hominem

So you believe in a cartoon ball. What then?

Do you believe in dinosaurs Citizen?

here's a great example of an ad hominem

https://ibb.co/Wk3BYxB

I think they found soft tissue in dinosaur bones

can I get a source on that

I think there was probably giant lizards whos bones in most cases have been improperly put back together

These guys are annoying

there were giant lizards

in straya

A source on the soft tissue ?

aye

Improperly put back together?

What do you mean?

Yes

there were giant lizards in straya

40k years ago

Look it up I’m on my cellphone

@dustbreather hey 👋

Multiple species mixed together.

@The Gwench good evening

Mainstream science found the soft tissue I’m pretty sure though

see whenever I ask for a source I usually get "look it up yourself"

Tooth found. Then they construct a fantasy creature from it.

I don't see how they would be put back together incorrectly when they seem to fit when you see them

they found a skull

many vertebrae

hips

leg bones

In your mind

ok citizen you can't reply that to anything you don't believe in

You are a believer. Thanks for clarification

...

Lol