ok doesnt matter

eratosthenes debunked next

jeremy

look

i have a video

i sent it to u

ok ill watch it later

chillin with the fam

Then you can measure side angles from three points and measure the difference in shadows from three points

aetos

you can also use two

Using two points the conclusion must be based on the initial assumption

ok despite his flawed experiment eratosthenes is debunked

u wanna move on'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YaPa4esJJx4

also the whole story of him is suspicious if u look into it

well, if he only used 2 sticks then i guess it's flawed from the get go

how

...

astral he measured the path the sun takes over earth at the equinox thats all he did

Jeremy, I just demonstrated how your entire point is groundless. Why base things on something 2000 years old when I can do a better version of the same test and get the answers appropriately?

because, his experiment prove neither way

chesty asked me why i think the globe is suspicious

It was accurate for its time.

thats what i was going through aetos

You base your suspicion on a flawed, two thousand year old experiment?

<:GWchadThonkery:366999788803325952>

Seems legit.

people thought the earth was flat 2000 year ago

Some did

😦

Some didn’t

but with technology we know it isnt

when the mainstream claims we knew the earth was a sphere since his experiment i am basing suspicion on the fact mainstream claims that since it was a flawed experiment yes

im just telling u what is suspicious to me

Ignore what the mainstream says and focus on the general evidence. This is the reason I never converted to being a flat earther.

And Jeremy, that’s totally fair

mainstream is runnin around saying we knew we were on a sphere since 200 bc but if the experiment proved nothing why is mainstream claiming that

You can view things how you want, I’m just trying to explain my take, I guess.

doesn't the general evidence come mostly from the mainstream?

nah that to simplify things for the public