I have a picture from Apollo 11 that literally shows ZERO stars from the lunar surface.

I would've sent it myself but I don't have image permissions

Yeah you dumbass because the moon has no atmosphere

Meep, you’re an idiot.

And it's because the picture was taken in the lunar day

Means that the sunlight was too strong and basically didn't allow light from other stars to show up

@meep as a programmer I agree

Lmaooo

Exposure was pretty much THE reason

Dude just aborted his entire arguement

Cuz we presented him with facts

Where’s the stars, meep?

Owned.

Oh my fuc kin god

If Buzz Aldrin could see the stars brighter than we can here, and you’re saying we can’t see them at all because of a fanciful claim you can’t prove, you’re a moron.

Those 2 missions have 2 EXTREMELY DIFFERENT sensors and FOCAL LENGTHS

And also EXPOSURE???

You're the moron here.

Oh, we can see the earth, but not any stars whatsoever, because of exposure, when there’s no obstruction in space at all.. Sure thing.

Do you know what sunlight is? @Derek Nelson

Do you know how much stronger the sunlight is in space rather than on earth?

You absolute cretin. Those 2 pics were captured on LUNAR DAY. Most stars are usually very dim, and with the sunlight being much closer to the moon than even the closest star to our solar system, all of the light from those stars disappear because of exposure, and the sunlight obstructing it.

Lol.

Yeah, you say "lol." instead of:
Accepting your defeat
or
Presenting an actual arguement

You show how uneducated and mindless you are.

Sure thing, Mr. vacuum with no seal.

...

Do you know what a gravitational field is?

A theory.

No.

Do you?

Yes.

Yup.

Is a theory admissible as proof?

Gravity holds our atmosphere in place.

Nope.

It's not a theory.

And there is proof.

Yes, it is a theory. Sorry.