Message from @Pence
Discord ID: 583332729022709760
@Pence Yes because it is an example of appealing to nature/naturalism and it is very much an argument when it comes to talking about anything and everything especially with logical fallacies
how was the Chicago thing debunked
explain pls
I’ve seen that article over a hundred times
So naturally I went over it and debunked it
how did u debunk it
delta listen to me earth is in a container you cannot have a pressurized system against a vacuum without a container it is a natural law
Observation
@Soldz (CF) I'm appealing to factual evidence that many people have attempted them selves.
Mathematics
lol that article debunked that picture
angular resolution
if i get higher does my angle change ?
@Pence <:THONKINGNGNGNNGNGNGNGN:352104596560412672> Meaning?
uh ok
Whatever you say bud
Go there yourself and take a pic @DeltaA350
And debunk the pic I sent
lol how did it not debunk the link I sent
tell me
I asked you first
@Soldz (CF) meaning I am appealing to factual evidence while you're only appealing to speculation which hasn't been proven
how did the link I sent not debunk whatever trig u sent
explain instead of telling me it's wrong
I told you
Smh
explain
Scroll up
if u go in a long halwlays with a camera on the ceiling and a camera on the floor the camera on the floor will see more of the ceiling and the camero on the ceiling will see more of the floor
~~Note: I am a Christian myself, so don't say you need to open your eyes to god or whatever.~~
I’m not gonna tell you again
@Pence so if you can't see a ship anymore it's over the curve?
lol
Chicago does appear hundreds of feet below
humans can look about 40km
that's why you can only see the top half of sears tower
@Pence Anything I say I know to either be a fact or not like if I don't what something is I'm going to say it
@United Netherlands it's on another part of the Earth so far that the curve covers it.
and the Netherlands is flat for 300 miles
@DeltaA350 show me water curving
And I’ll believe it
1 mountain btw, great for tourism
@Soldz (CF) that sentence made absolutely zero sense.