And now we've got a pretty accurate model

To explain what we experience

When you come to a on a model it must be the most accurate one

Gravity in itself can't a fact

The theory of gravity isn't a fact

But it works

are you playing semantics? Do you mean that you like to call the property of dense things falling through less-dense things 'gravity'? Or are you proposing there is some invisible 'gravitational force'? Because if you want to call things falling 'gravity' go right ahead.

What people believe is that there is a force pulling us to a center

Okay

Why do objects with a large mass have a large force

Downwards, that is

Archimedes Principle

who the fook tagged me

I'm talking about your theory of density being the only reason that things go down

why do helium balloons fall up?

They are less dense than air

I can’t believe people actually believe the earth is flat

Use your critical thinking skills

ok. large mass objects are more dense than air.

What do you think happens after they reach the top of the atmospheric gases?

<:flatearth:564527756180979724>

If you had an indestructible helium balloon

they get to a point of equilibrium

You think it would just float off into space

just like all things

Okay okay imagine toys

This

*

Isn’t there pictures of balloons going into orbit and seeing the flat earth?

Not toys

densely-massed things seek equilibrium in the same enclosed system as the rest of it

round*

Yes but they're not real because no pictures of space are real

Obviously

Cmon

Oh yeah the fish eyes lenses excuse

Forgot that’s what they pull

Okay guys imagine this

The heliocentric model arose because man changed the shape of the earth itself to cater to their belief they could explain the celestial in a natural sense. (They literally need to change the shape of a flat floor, even after its scientifically provable the floor is flat, for their beliefs to make sense.)

Listennnnnnn

well if the same curvature in 'space' is found at ground-level it's obviously a fish-eye