The argument is whether that was enough to destroy the building

A plane ain't enough to take down those behemoths

mh maybe you had to see it with your own eyes...
maybe the cgi was just that 'good' that there was no chance for people to identify

I'm pretty sure the planes hit

News didn't have enough time to cgi that

Have you seen the CNN documentary?

the panes didn't directly take down the towers, the fires did that came from the planes

>no plane parts found in wreckage

@Bibleman yes there was

It's in the 9/11 museum

LOL MUSEUMS

Unless they took a burn piece of the huge plane

https://youtu.be/_qiVBOqNiOs

Aka what they want you to see

yeh there is

but definitely not a reason for the collapse. the workers who built the tower said that a few planes could hit the steel tower and it would not even shake

no even if it had burnt the whole night.. it would not have been collapsed by an plane crash

I wish I knew the name of the documentary so I can send it

@Bibleman there definitely were planes

@credereLibertatem it did burn the whole night

People weren't able to work for weeks

I said 'if'.. The steel would have taken it

I meant it did burn the whole night

People that got cancer and lived or worked in lower Manhattan can actually sue the city for not warning them about the excess smoke

Law suits happen to this day

@Hamburger Guy they did

And still are

They are getting free insurance check ups

And some compensation

they were not in free fall

Even smokers get compensated

you can see stuff fall faster that is in free fall

@Hamburger Guy let's be honest they are worried about their own damage lol

@Bibleman nice low quality gif

You using Windows XP?

the main building was not going as fast as other objects in free fall

I've seen footage faster than that

what do you all think about 'why ' they did it..? Different opinions?

Casus belli

A kid model has 195k followers and nbc 6 is promoting her