nothing like throwing away what's commonly accepted in favor of a theory you can't even move past discord

which is totally fair, as we do the exact same thing

Interesting. Not very useful. But interesting.

Have you seen photos of the Saturn V during underexpansion

Not really, we have directions observable evidence for gravity.

https://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a410/ap10-KSC-69PC-188HR.jpg

look at this

rad

Via LIGO.

we appeal to dark energy to help explain gravity on macro scales. it's a fudge factor.

remember NASA lies and cannot be trusted in any way shape or form /s

heck

back to ms paint

it's an attempt to maintain the rules of general relativity.

@Drewski4343 nyeh https://phys.org/news/2007-02-macro-micro-theories-gravity.html

relevant article

we should all join vc

btw, i don't buy into UA, i just think it's interesting

and none of us are qualified to discuss GR

specifically: we can't do the math to disprove it

it just goes right over our head

totally agree with you there

I challenge someone to derive an equation that could replace GR

if they could they wouldn't be on this server

though, GR openly has problems

grrrrrrrrrrrrrr

They're grrrrrreat

well we can just.jump that's proof and tbh next to them where pretty much einstein

frosted or unfrosted?

frosted like a chad

@Superiorna_Artiljerija

alright there was one right answer

and you chose the correct one

but yeah if you can poke holes in GR and provide the necessary proof, you don't belong on this server

you'd be wasting time when you could be changing the world of physics and astrophysics

with 99.99% certainty people here claim they destroyed GR, but have failed to provide enough proof and a derivation for their proof

scientists have already poked holes in GR

yees but not us

it doesn't work on macro and quantum levels. alright, well, I'm still allowed to relay information

yeah

we just appeal to authority