That’s what we use to date things
A..
Are you serious?
Here is a starting point
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%E2%80%93Ar_dating
Scientists only publicize radiometric datings that fit with evolutionists preexisting timeline
Rubbish
About 50 percent of dates are thrown away cause they don’t fit
Okay
Listen
I’m going to attempt to give you a lesson in radiometric dating
And I’m gonna hope that by the end of this, you throw out the idea that it’s inaccurate
We have an equation
N(t) = N_0 e^-kt
Alright
Where N_0 = the initial value
e is Eulers number
k is the constant of proportionality
and t is time
Do you understand?
Yeah
We know that argon has 8 electrons, and thus has little to no reactivity
Do you agree
We know that by using quantum physics, we can calculate the half life of potassium 40, an isotope of potassium, to be 1.25 billion years
Do you agree?
I did not know that
Are you going to continue?
Yes
We know that K-40, potassium 40, decays into two atoms
since it’s radioactive
Argon 40, and Calcium 39
We know that 11% is argon 40, and 89% is Ca 39
Isn't it Ca-40?
@NickC64 sorry I had to go, I'm at work)
No
Lol
