Message from @zirpu
Discord ID: 608092842027384843
Go research it and come back
I can't research it for you
while its moving around the sun? The sun which also moves in a path?
Scale
You are forgetting the scale we are looking at
Stars are so far the only movement weve noticed in them is the stars that are closest like Barnards star. And its movement is tiny over years and years.
And? You have an object moving on it axis which moves around the another object. How would it see the same object everyday? The fact that it's so far away and stationery just reinforces flat earth geocentrism
Do I have to draw it for you or can you research it yourself?
Even if you can't understand this thing there are many simpler things we can discuss that debunk your theory.
Lmfao, its your own model that makes no sense. The fact that its so far away, which you admitted, proves that the earth is stationery and geocentric.
Stars are far away so earth is flat?
Do you know how many flat earth articles I have read
And most of them have false information
So what does that say about this theory
Star is far away and appears in the same spot every night thus the earth is flat and geocentric. If the earth was moving around the sun we would never see Polaris in the same spot everyday
@_Ciprian There are many flat earth sabotagers be careful
Okay
Well if the earth is flat then why would the government hide it from us
The flat earth society was one of the main sabotagers which pushed the heliocentric model on the flat earth that we don't believe in.
Just saying, Polaris was not always the north star and it's not going to remain the north star indefinitely
Alright, since you won't research it lets talk about some spherical earth evidence I shouldn't have to explain.
```The precession of the Earth's axis has a number of observable effects. First, the positions of the south and north celestial poles appear to move in circles against the space-fixed backdrop of stars, completing one circuit in approximately 26,000 years. Thus, while today the star Polaris lies approximately at the north celestial pole, this will change over time, and other stars will become the "north star".[2] In approximately 3200 years, the star Gamma Cephei in the Cepheus constellation will succeed Polaris for this position. The south celestial pole currently lacks a bright star to mark its position, but over time precession also will cause bright stars to become south stars. As the celestial poles shift, there is a corresponding gradual shift in the apparent orientation of the whole star field, as viewed from a particular position on Earth.```
Like how the moon stays the same apparent size until it sets.
Everytime a globe earthers can't come up with anything he resorts to do your own research and why would NASA lie about globe earth
If the moon was moving away, it would get smaller in the sky
Yet it stays the same size.
it's funny how FE are the ones who usually bring up NASA
Every time a flat earther can’t come up with any thing they say do your own research
Another debunk involving the moon, thanks to lunar libration we know the moon is a sphere. If earth was flat people in different places would see different sides of the moon from different angles. Yet everyone always sees the same face and side of the moon.
And another one which is very simple, the moon is literally upside down in australia.
It's funny how you're just saying buzz words
I never mentioned nasa or gravity in this message
Wonderful how we can debunk this theory with just the moon isn't it?
Hey, good one! I forgot that the moon was upside down in Australia
Always talk about the stars, but i forgot about the moon
Also they can see portions of the milky way there we cant, also constellations and the Carina nebula.
Guys. an i send a pictyre
i want to send a pic
pls
To take pictures of space you need a tracking mount to account for earths rotation called a german equatorial mount. It aligns with your celestial pole based on your latitude. It wouldnt work too well on a flat earth 😅