Don’t worry guys, he has the proof. He wants us to “look it up.”

"you can't observe deflection" prove that you can't

None of these articles mentions a telescope experiment that can observe gravitational deflection. Am I just talking to kids who browses r/IFLS all day and have no idea what they are actually reading?

Well we are teens after all.

https://www.cnet.com/news/jupiter-just-got-slammed-by-something-so-big-we-saw-it-from-earth/

You clearly haven’t read any of them, as you have just been typing here the entire time

i mean you have no intrest in looking from our perspective

Seems you guys have no proof for your claims after all, another globe earther claim with no proof to support it. The argument was about being able to use the scientific method to observe gravitational attraction on Jupiter with a telescope @SAM101907

this is utterly pointless all because of you, hope you know that

anyways gotta blast have a nice day everyone

@rivenator12113 Lol after you’ve ignored everything put forward for you 🤦 Stay ignorant.

You asked for an experiment. We gave you plenty, we even gave you alternate ones that give you more control over what you observe. Is your brain so limited that you can understand the correlation between the experiments?
We gave you plenty of proof, you dismissed them without even providing a reason.
@rivenator12113

Inb4 his next line is “you guys don’t have proof for your claims.”

'' We can prove gravitational attraction exists because of X.''
'' Post article about Y ''

There can be multiple ways to prove something.

@rivenator12113 You clearly never read anything put forward 🤦

No, gravity is gravity, you wanted gravity affecting things, we have you gravity affecting things, but you're too focused on your religion to even try to understand

But the main problem here is that you're going on about complicated things like gravity when you can't even explain simple things like the angle of shadows or seasons or day light cycles

Your model is flawed at its very base

We don't need to go high level to prove you wrong

An amateur astronomer just saw a meteor smash into Jupiter and snapped the photos, it was in a link above.

Angles of shadows easily explained

Seasons easily explained

Not for the globe

Yes they are....

Globe is the religion

Wake up

1 globe model explains shadows, seasons and day /night
3 fe models for these 3

😂

Fe is the religion, it's even based on a religious book

You have strong religious beliefs

The religion of the big bang and monkeys

Define religion

The Big Bang is a religion? 😂

Seasons cant work on the globe

Wrong

Seasons absolutely work on the globe, but thanks for ignoring my question

The heliocentric model is flawed. There os multiple models and none work

Pretty sure that's exactly what I said about FE

There is 1 globe model

Do i look like your monkey that answers to you