so your point is, from what i understand

i get that reference go for xenophile vit

bouyancy is a byproduct of Gravity? you're not even using mainstream science w/ that claim

either n1 alines

aliens*

or there was a natural thing that reflected there

Xenophile? hmmmm

Without gravitt, buoyancy doesnt exist

what is it

@Ronin get's it

you need a vectorial acceleration force for it to exist

@Teddy even if they were none would be powerful or accurate enough to go to a meter squared cube on the moon and back.

natural Vanish

Archimedes' principle states that the upward buoyant force that is exerted on a body immersed in a fluid, whether fully or partially submerged, is equal to the weight of the fluid that the body displaces and acts in the upward direction at the center of mass of the displaced fluid.[1] Archimedes' principle is a law of physics fundamental to fluid mechanics. It was formulated by Archimedes of Syracuse.[2]

key word

the weight of the fluid being displaced

f-fluid mechanics 😨

Define up

you don't have weight without gravity

people say it's hard

so you have 0 boyancy in space

^^^^^ that way @Ronin

you are going to flow through a fluid

which gravity Vanish guy? Newton's? Einsteins?

if there was one

It’s the same gravity

no it isn't

It is.

The thing that makes us fall, were talking common sense

Yes it is

one of them isn't accepted by mainstream science anymore

are you impliying natural law changes, or that we are getting better at masuring it @RidleyChozo

what has gravity to do with anything

Yes, it is outdated. But still useful small scale

Gravity=mass×weight if i remember correctly.

why ant there be gravity on a flat earth

he's implying both theories are different therefore both are not trustworthy

which gravity? can you stick with a train of thought?

also in engineering we still use newtonian principles on a daily basis

because they are useful on human scales

Thats not the f point