^

I don’t understand what the debate is about. Blood types?

You need evidence or some sort of proof to back up your claim

and more than 4 blood types would be a huge scientific find

No?

Metallica is right

you need evidence

no, we don't

Again. What you’re saying means nothing without actual proof.

If this is a debate, you can’t use fallacies and you have to provide sources

I don’t even know what’s going on though lol

i agree with @EDGE

what

You need a source.

you do

let him carry on

he is in the middle of a lecture

Your argument is invalid if there was nothing but ideas to prove it

we are listening

you need evidence

you don't need to believe it

I on't

??

don't*

????

yes you do

What

You do

yur arg

ik what hes saying is the truth

@Lulaliva if the purpose is persuasion, you should try to make your argument convincing by backing it up

your*

@phased this is not argument or debate

it is a tedtalk

now listen please

Wait what

Sarcasm?

There’s AB, A, B, and O

when he finishes then u can scrutinize

Positives and negatives

argument can't just be theory without proof