he did post a link

Its garbage

@the21cat you mean the youtube rocket vid?

oh that

So we all take the word of a shitty experiment from youtube?

@Citizen Z again, I could afford to replicate and improve the experiment shown, so if you want to find out why not try it out yourself? Within your own parameters

@brother mutton then why believe youtube?

You just believe it?

I dont see why ...

@Citizen Z where exactly did I say that?

I used to believe it all also

So im not saying you are a lost cause just yet

I used to troll flat earthers and laugh at them

Years ago

Then i realized i was part of a belief system

@Citizen Z listen my guy I appreciate your personal beliefs and how you came to find them but I didn't really come here for your biography

Sorry if that sounded hostile

@brother mutton its my way of trying to connect. I dont know how else to tell you...

Im still waiting for your proof from a real vacuum chamber

@brother mutton what was the point of the rocket experiment anyway. What were you trying to prove or suggest

Send definitive proof

Thats all

Or else i chalk it up as a belief. Not Science

Its that simple

@the21cat to prove that rockets can function in a vacuum

We already knew that

Yes plz prove it

It can be proven without even a rocket

Wait, so rockets can't work in a vacuum?

@the21cat show the experiment then

its conservation of momentum

Would be a fun one to replicate - would need the vacuum chamber AND a rocket with an oxidizer tank... which would be difficult to create

you take a frictionless track with carts

without being a rocket engineer

add mass do a collision and measure velocity

https://youtu.be/KBMU6l6GsdM need to show this experiment in high vacuum chamber on earth. not demonstrating their physics under a high vacuum on earth. How would they test a thruster to be able to perform in an environment with gravity but no atmosphere?

No vacuum experiments data. It's super duper secret

Thrusters
Rocket equation
High vacuum
Precision maneuvers

He claims the test is at .14 PSI which is 7 torr. LEO vacuum is .0000001 torr

https://www1.grc.nasa.gov/facilities/spf/

The chamber can sustain a high vacuum (10 to 6 torr) and provide an optically tight, high-emissivity, thermal background environment of –160°C to 60°C (–250°F to +140°F) within the 12-m- (40-ft-) diameter by 12-m- (40 ft-) high variable-geometry cryogenic shroud.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum

i have seen all sorts of numbers for LEO pressure from 10^-6 to 10^-9

On that NASA website the pressure is a typo it says 10^6 which is 100000 torr which is 1,933 PSI.

there is psi , torr and pascal... too many units to convert
also ksi https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/458198461309779970/458395638930079744/unknown-30-1-2.png https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/458198461309779970/458395639378739222/unknown-2-3-2.png https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/458198461309779970/458395639378739223/unknown-1-3-2.png https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/458198461309779970/458395639806427136/unknown-10-2.png

Well, they tested rockets in space since the 1940s...

or near space

It's a bit rich being asked to consturct a vacuum pressure with a rocket when there is not even a reliable explanation or experiment for why objects experience a constant 9.8 m/s2 acceleration.

its not a thruster for say its momentum being given to gas particles to push of the rocket is the best way I'll describe it simply

bathrobe dwane gets unbanned today yay