lmao

lol markers @Edillon

The only technology flat earthers believe in are the ones that can support their beliefs.

lmao gas @Superiorna_Artiljerija

this @Firey

Anything else is not a 'naturally observed phenemonen.'

yeah

I was listening to an argument yesterday about the validity of the Saturn V

We can't even use atomic clocks now.

Most of the argument was "it just wasn't possible"

As if gravity isn’t a naturally observed phenomena

of course not

Pendulums are apparently not natural either.

the dome keeps it all together

Something about gravity is that flat earthers don't have a set standard to build off of

also the moon and sun geocentric thing is wrong because the moon would be noticed wherever you are

same with the sun

I heard someone say that gravity is actually density caused by earth's magnetic field

Must a pretty quality dome, been together for 6000 years without issue. Yet I need to replace my windows every 25 years.

electric field*

Electromagnetism is just a term they use when they can't explain crap.

The best part is that you can't even see the dome

crystal clear

😂

wait then how do things get above the atmosphere?

They don't

if there is a dome

oh right

Because they need to push on the air

rockets don't work

Speaking of air and the dome

Donald trump is a liberal change my mind

I was thinking last night of how air pressure would be distributed if there was a dome

if there is an equal layer around the flat earth, the air would need to be dragged to the north pole

Must be a big filter and pump or something.

if it was pressure, an area at the base of the dome would have a high pressure right next to the dome

Which means something that used air as lift could crash into it

if the dome was really high and the pressure gradient was similar to what is experienced on earth, there would be an area of the dome that would qualify as a vacuum

so is there an accurate dome description?

About as accurate as any other I’ve heard

Does this mean I'm a flat earther