Not saying the Bible isn't real, but I'm just pointing out the flaw of the argument at hand

thats my new favorite picture

heyo pepes

Honestly I don’t think religion is a good choice of argument

For instance, say someone here is a Jewish (I’m not, so correct me if I’m wrong) I’m sure there’s plenty of buildings that are mentioned in their religion

I for one am agnostic so I don’t really care, but just because there’s buildings from the Bible proves almost nothing

That’s like saying “There’s an apple tree that Adam and Eve are from therefore Christianity is the correct religion because apple trees exist”

Christianity = judaisms successful reboot

Lmao

True tho, it does really come into doubt when you bring stories like noahs arc into play, where we cannot find evidence of the entire world being flooded

Indeed

I for one went to a catholic school for 5 years, so no one can say I don’t know what I’m talking about lol

That would involve the creation of rivers so huge they would be unmissable on the geological record

I probably know every story

Right

And say there was a giant flood, I’m sure absolutely no one but Noah would survive

She’s human population extinct the moment he died

*Making human

Noah and his fam*

it's funny you say that there's no evidence of flooding

Epic inbreeding time

No not that

What no one said that lol

Oooohh show me the huge river channels

I did btw

Ohlol

Well, I’m just saying I don’t think there was a flood big enough to cover *the entire world*

Long Term Woz#6666 LANGUAGE!!!

Is it yeet?

Oh

Don't say the y word 😳😳😳

Forbidden

🤭🤭🤭

Bruh

70% of the world is already covered in water, take a second to think about that and how it might be related to flooding

Hmmmm big think here, but thats not enough to cover the entire surface

More like 70%

Find me a record saying that at one p- ^^

There was definitely never a point where 100% was covered

Because then, quite literally every land animal would have died