Message from @‘Eru’
Discord ID: 610116721357094933
Just noticed you were still trying to figure it out
Well it's kinda refreshing, it's usually 3 fe vs 1 ge
Lets assume that you wait, the deflection would still be too negligible to observe and it would appear as if they didn't change trajectory.
And the fe just insult the ge until he disconnects
@rivenator12113 and how would you know that? Have you done it?
How do you know that? You haven’t even done it yet
How would you know that you could see it deflect with a modern telescope?
Wasn't that your point
We are telling you that you will, you are trying to claim you can't for some reason
HE SAID HE OBSERVED IT
PLUS THERE WAS ONE WHO RECENTLY SAW SOMETHING CRASH INTO JUPITER
Any evidence to support your claim?
One of the articles I linked in the other chat was of an amateur who snapped photos of a meteor hitting Jupiter with his own telescope.
Why can't you find ONE scientific article that talks about your scientific method? What's wrong lol?
We found 3 dude, why can't you read?
'' Scientific article about the scientific method that can support your argument that we are able to see 2 celestial objects deflect with a telescope '' Do you even know what your argument is or do you keep switching ever 2 seconds?
This has been done countless time. Astronomers have predicted a certain amount of deflection from gravity of an object, then observed and measured it in reality.
Article doesn't talk about gravitational attraction. Do you even read before posting articles?
Jesus christ
A$AP#4062 LANGUAGE!!!
You're right, it talks about gravitational evaporation...
This funny
The article talked about observing Jupiter, which you said is impossible
Straw man again <:lul:484994724118134784>
(that was sarcasm btw, i dont know if you can pick up on this, since you can't actually read and comprehend texts from 3rd grade books)
**Question of The Day #163**
Should the Clinton Foundation be exempt from paying taxes?
Share your thoughts in the <#484514023698726912> 😃
no
How is that strawman, it's exactly what you asked
Ah yes, a strawman because you can’t address the substance
Are you even understanding the words you say or are you a bot saying random things?
@Akhanyatin I know your post was too retarded, I replied to your buddy which was a little bit less dumb
I'm not saying you replied to me, i was making sure you're not dumb enough to think it was true
Heya
<#547645432604393482> 162 yeah probably, 163 what.
Yo
@SAM101907 Did I ever claim that we can't see Jupiter? Imagine straw manning this hard when you lose the debate so you can red herring to switch subjects. Won't work on me pal 😃
**smiley face**
I'm laughing at how people can be this dumb lol
i learned that human sheeple doesn't like turks
Ah well