Message from @Kebab Removalist
Discord ID: 614430365301473281
https://imgur.com/hdCNQil
https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/1158337/ewton-wrong-science-dismiss-isaac-newton-theory-gravity-albert-einstein-black-hole/amp
https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/ESSAYS/Bekenstein/bekenstein.html
```GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE
Newton's theory of gravitation was discarded in 1915 in favor of
Albert Einstein's theory of Special Relativity asserting
That gravity was caused by time dilation from geodesics
Warping the fabirc of 4D lorentz space-time.
Aside from the heavily cherry picked Cavendish and
torsion field balance experiments, there is a
Major lack of cause and effect experimental evidence
To scientifically validate gravity, it remains to this
Very day only a theory!```
Boom
The more simplistic way to understand it is mass attracting mass, but that was an incomplete theory. As of right now, the bending of space time is the more accurate of the two. Although, Newtonian gravity works just fine at scales we experience everyday, as the space time that you bend from your mass is insignificant to that of the earths.
https://imgur.com/hdCNQil
https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/1158337/ewton-wrong-science-dismiss-isaac-newton-theory-gravity-albert-einstein-black-hole/amp
https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/ESSAYS/Bekenstein/bekenstein.html
```GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE
Newton's theory of gravitation was discarded in 1915 in favor of
Albert Einstein's theory of Special Relativity asserting
That gravity was caused by time dilation from geodesics
Warping the fabirc of 4D lorentz space-time.
Aside from the heavily cherry picked Cavendish and
torsion field balance experiments, there is a
Major lack of cause and effect experimental evidence
To scientifically validate gravity, it remains to this
Very day only a theory!```
Let’s look at bending of space time as that’s the more accepted theory
Sure we can try to
Cool ok why do you believe in this when there is no evidence to it ?
There’s plenty of evidence to support it, they use it to calculate the movements of celestial bodies all the time. In fact Veritasium did a video on them attempting to proof GR wrong with a defunked satellite.
Yes he has also measured radiation in sieverts when yes they can be used but the more easily quantifiable Measurement is a rad
Measurements used for radiation differ all the time 🤷
Yes but rads is the easiest one and is what scientists usually use
It depends, rads are used to measure the amount of radiation absorbed by human tissue, sieverts measures the potential harm caused with respect to the type of radiation and where it was absorb. At least that is what my limited knowledge of the subject has led me to understand
Yes I think sieverts are unnecessary
Also it has very strange measurements like 2 sieverts will kill you where as with rads it’s 400 that will possibly kill you
That’d be a good question for a nuclear physicist, I have no idea why they do graduate them the way they do
Yes will ask one if I get a chance
Somebody wanna play on My Minecraft Server`?
im serious who wants to join
he muted me
Minecraft is toxic to the soul
@Kebab Removalist there really not
roentgen is best
@Michael the Exalted#7557 not really
Yes gone
Left
Thank god
Lol
JOIN VC
Oki
@1144oli roentgen? Why roentgen?
Sievert is the way to go to measure radiation exposure of living organisms.
How can I chat in the flat earth server?
Sup GaMeRs
imagine being this uncultured and saying gamers instead of gaymers
Hey thats a good point lesbianmer
Welcome to the Ice Wall!
U gotta look out for females as well
you're right
my apologies
no problemo