Morality emerged from utilitarian behavior.

But utilitarian for who? For the group or for the individual?

@T2the2ndpowr Not necessarily. I'm just saying that the more intense the emotion is, the more we should value it because the further the animal is from being unconscious (I'm assuming the evolution of consciousness was a continuous process)

There is a moral action that an Atheist can't make: Repent.

When the Atheis repents, he is no longer an atheist.

Although the assumption that chickens and fish have less intense emotions is obviously a difficult one

That is because repentance can only be don by accepting God.

I think that’s poor. The whole idea of repenting is poor

In your opinion, yes.

But I wouldn't say its "poor" because it has been studied and analyzed for 2000 years by various scholars and hermits in Orthodoxy.

repentance is just a useful emotion, atheism is rejecting the hypothesis of god.

Rejecting the hypothesis of God is non-scientifical

by rejecting I mean saying its not true/unlikely

Rejecting the Theory of God might be more scientifical.

I’ve always had a problem with the whole repent and get into heaven thing. Rejecting the idea of the Christian god isn’t non scientific

Not really.

I think it’s fair and could be I guess respectable to be a deist but to be a theist I think is obviously not scientific at all

It depends on the criteria you are prepeared to accept in order to estblish a truth

😂

That is your opinion, ofc.

Science isn’t opinionated

Actually it is

Not at all lol

Tell me how it is

I'm a fan of whats real so I like reality to tell me whats true

"Thomas Kunn" - The Nature of Scientifical Revolutions. You will understand.

How is science opinionated @Yussuki ₪

Through peer-review criteria (and that is 1 aspect)

It’s just a process to study evidence and determine if it’s true

But you understand they are using the scientific method

It’s not just peer review as in just looking at it and seeing if they like it

The conclusions are dependent on the structuring criteria and pre-determined conditions

Scientific Method may fail quite hard. This is why there are other methods that may eventually corroborate with the Scientific method. Truth is always set as a matter of consensus.

youre such a postmodernist

Like Zion you’re using the right language but I guess you’re missing something.

What’s an example of where science doesn’t work and you need other systems

Lol 😄 No, actually this has been established since "The Theory of Natural Philosophy" - By Roger Boscovich in the 1700s

Don’t just make statements explain them

When you choose which ice-cream to choose. When you choose wheather you stay with rent or buy.

In most human situations actually

"established" I would say made fun of since then