> But in this example it is a bloody sharp response... @MerlinCrow no. This is the argument of the god believer. It misunderstands the burden of proof.
> I know, but in this case it hits the point were it is right open to be prod... @MerlinCrow but it is on @Smoke to defend his point, not defer back to Trav.
> @m.miller What point did I make, you have sufficiently confused me x) @Smoke you were trying to 'prove' the existence of the subconscious by asking how we know it ISN'T there.
my only 2 cents: build it slowly! don't sacrifice quality just to get bodies in the server. your opening is really your main shot at creating whatever culture you want from the git go
