They'll complain about the education system but when it actually comes down to fixing the problems within the system they just *don't*. Sure they may offer alternatives but most of the time we were just told to sit and spin.

Charter schools and vouchers are a crapshoot. There's as many shitty charter schools as good ones. Hell, every year or so a racially woke charter school ends up getting outed for basically having neglected to teach kids how to read for 8 years of K-8.

At least that's how it was in my state

My hard drive made a time stamp 40 years ago, and here I AM today with evidence (or lack therof "Higher Education") in the ranks of any Federal Government Sponsored Program.

There was one school a few years back that infamously trained their kids to write complex looking equations.

But otherwise, just did bumfights

like seriously.

like in Brooklyn?

They couldn't even read.

No, this was like in the US South.

shit happens when you ask the market to solve problems lol

like in Brooklyn?

like in Detroit?

Like every kid out there in BLM and Antifa?

like your God Damned Unions and Democrat Party?

The point I made is that a freer market doesn't guarantee shit.

Tell me your skool system is kool

An entire generation of students utterly failed by their system

no, you socialists make any system shit

And the republicans **let them.**

Bro, I am as anti-union as they come.

then get on the train, because the democrats are going to be ruin

I hate them more than anything in the universe right now

I am unwilling to throw the public education baby out with the corrupt school bathwater, as it might be.

I just believe there needs to be reform.

No demorat has earned anything from me in government in my entire existance.

EVER

in all Eternity

they have personally pissed me off than any other tribal cretin from any other Nation

Maybe that's in your case, but I remember when Democrats were the party of ensuring you didn't lose the family farm for half a century.

Bullshit

they were lied to then just as now

FDR? really?

I am not in disagreement that farm bills were generally laden with a shitton of pork, but frankly, in less liquid times, it meant the difference between keeping a farm and losing one.

Because agriculture is inherently unstable from year to year.

We always subsidize that

how do you ever back off?

*Shouldn't* we subsidize our food supply?

If there was anything worth subsidizing, *SURELY* food should be a high priority as long as we don't go full retard Big Corn.

yeha

I will not argue