Message from @1011001
Discord ID: 506837310487396353
I think this about sums up today's conversation: Ambiguity causes additional misinformation and allows a basis for malicious action (either past or future). It is wiser to denote a problem, while siting historical facts; thus providing insight into acknowledgement of exactly where a side-track was acted upon. -Yet being mindful to those whom don't understand and analyze a problem as well as you.
I did bring sauce and it was rejected with an aruement with no sauce
Check out @mitchellvii’s Tweet: https://twitter.com/mitchellvii/status/1057235314538938368?s=09
@JBS59 I came in near the end and missed what happened prior. I agree that the flow of historical action can be analyzed and should be; when a clear distinction of cross-roads causes a societal choice is either "A" or "B". It's where we learn from history and shape the future.
Check out @JudicialWatch’s Tweet: https://twitter.com/JudicialWatch/status/1057274973755183105?s=09
😔 🤔 ANONYMOUS- UNMASKED A MESSAGE FROM VIDIUS - REVELATIONhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cSMTJweiZNU
This is discusting👆
👀
Check out @OANN’s Tweet: https://twitter.com/OANN/status/1057280859160698880?s=09
Check out @ArchKennedy’s Tweet: https://twitter.com/ArchKennedy/status/1057281462033100800?s=09
Thanks for moving me ...AGAIN!