Figuring out all of the sources of funding for climate change is probably a difficult task because it comes from all sorts of sources. The biggest one might be the Federal governments or the UN, I'm not sure. But there's also universities, non-profits, and things like that. So it doesn't make sense to say it's all a concerted effort with some secret agenda behind it.

@Jayde I'm all right. I'm at work right now

But if your the one saying "it's the funding, follow the money." I would expect you to have the data on that

If my memory is correct....HRC was supposed to win by getting 98% of the vote???????????? Same math you use?

I'm sure Al Gore would agree w/ your logic. Of course, why wouldn't he............. 💰

Plenty of people have done the legwork and its public info..........HAPPY HUNTING

Yeah, I guess its not possible for there to be a large scale globalized hoax perpetrated on the people by corrupt centuries old "good ol boys club" and disseminated by the media who have long forgotten what investigative journalism actually is. Do I have all the data at my fingertips on climate "scientists" ...absolutely not. I would gladly start researching with you though.

Alarmism is one thing. I have no doubt that there is alarmism. But there's also 97% of scientists who are saying it's a very serious problem

and that includes left and right side media btw

That number is being told to you.

You will never find 97% of scientists who agree on anything my friend.

I try to do my research personally from both sides of the coin. I don't research any theory from a fixed point of view. That's benefits no one.

Here's your Climate Change..................D5 or Bucket #5

That # should tell you its a lie

Follow your nose! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toucan_Sam

They can't get the weather right 6 hours from now. Why the hell would i believe their predictions for 10 years or 100 years out c'mon bro

So you're offering up this number of 97%.....thats being parroted over and over and over again. And you say to yourself....it HAS to be true.....97% wouldn't lie about something like that. Thats a huge percentage. It sounds legit. And you leave it at that.

No further reading, no further investigating

And thats what they're counting on you to do.

And its worked for decades

without any viable changes to the data that supposedly supports the theory.

Decades hell its been 1,000's of years

Im talking about decades that they've been forcefeeding information to the public.

90% of statistics are made up right on the spot.

Yup

Yup

This is not a a left vs right battle. It never has been

Because there are corrupt republicans all over the map

The whole Bush family for one

but different story different day

This is about information. This is about finding the truth.

Not taking what you've been told at face value.

https://newsbreakinglive.com/2019/05/22/breaking-most-los-angeles-county-beaches-evacuated/

Opensecrets is a great website to start following any sort of money trail.

You can find out in detail who donated to what campaign when and how much.

Its a great jumping off block

Almost every credible scientific institution uses that 97% number. You're saying all of these institutions are not trustworthy? NASA, for example

NASA 🤦

Do me a favor friend ....and let me say im glad you're here...regardless if we ever agree or not