Message from @wheredowegofromhereQ
Discord ID: 580870782482382849
I'm here. If you don't have anything particular you want to discuss. I think climate change is a good one because it is strongly related to distrust in the media, distrust in science, etc.
The climate changes everyday.
Everyday the climate changes
For decades scientists have been warning us that man made causes are influencing the climate in disastrous ways and that we need to take action. Why ignore them?
Who calibrates that which the calibrators use to calibrate?
BREAKING: Federal Prosecutors Charge Michael Avenatti With Defrauding Porn Star Stormy Daniels https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/05/breaking-federal-prosecutors-charge-michael-avenatti-with-defrauding-porn-star-stormy-daniels/ … via @gatewaypundit
Not sure what you mean by that
First one must agree that the earth is only 6,000 years old.
Ok, got it. So in your case, it's NOT about some conspiracy, but simply your belief in a literal interpretation of the Bible.
Climate "scientists" you should follow the money. Who pays them who funds the "research"
Obviously if God created the Earth he would have made it indestructible by humans
There is no rational, logical, way to reason with someone like that.
There is undeniable evidence that the Bible is real and that God exists! Unless you believe its a conspiracy theory and man made it all up?
Then lets debate the science of it then
Its fear mongering.
Its a simple tactic of control.
Basic.
You've bought what they're selling.
Ok, so yes, the source of funding can certainly influence research to an extent, but a 97% consensus cannot be bought. There is a peer review process for publishing studies that acts as a sort of checks and balances. That being said, I think if we look into who did the funding it wouldn't be controversial.
You are unaware of how the review process and peer reviews work. Absolutely nothing is as it appears on the surface. You think all these reports are on the up and up, I worked doing medical lab research and no matter what your results were, your report said what they told you to say.
Trust is one thing, being blind is another.
The IPCC is an intergovernmental body under the auspices of the United Nations. Is there some agenda they have to somehow fabricate science and somehow silence scientist who disagree with their findings?
There is too much information out there to be ignorant these days.
Please see my earlier statement.
Its fear.
Money, power, control. Its simple. Always follow the money, always
Ok, lets follow the money. Who is funding climate research?
Well, lets figure it out. What scientist do you admire and trust for your information
what foundation
Is it all clean energy companies? No
You came to us you bring the sauce
Define clean energy
Creates alot of carbon to make a windmill. Takes alot of oil to keep one running too
<a:2857_PepeDontHaveTime:514348030166827028>