without any viable changes to the data that supposedly supports the theory.

Decades hell its been 1,000's of years

Im talking about decades that they've been forcefeeding information to the public.

90% of statistics are made up right on the spot.

Yup

Yup

This is not a a left vs right battle. It never has been

Because there are corrupt republicans all over the map

The whole Bush family for one

but different story different day

This is about information. This is about finding the truth.

Not taking what you've been told at face value.

https://newsbreakinglive.com/2019/05/22/breaking-most-los-angeles-county-beaches-evacuated/

Opensecrets is a great website to start following any sort of money trail.

You can find out in detail who donated to what campaign when and how much.

Its a great jumping off block

Almost every credible scientific institution uses that 97% number. You're saying all of these institutions are not trustworthy? NASA, for example

NASA 🤦

Do me a favor friend ....and let me say im glad you're here...regardless if we ever agree or not

Do me this favor, pick one institution....one scientist......start small. You can't take on the whole thing at once. Its impossible and completely overwhelming

Research is about connecting dots.

opensecrets looks like a legit source of information.

FACT: Did you know recent studies have found most Tuna in a Can is in fact NOT TUNA AT ALL.............💨

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1131318790564864001

Knowledge .... thats what fuels me. Thats what I devour on a daily basis.

I want to know whats behind the curtain thats behind the curtain thats behind the door.

Sometimes Im wrong. Or sometimes my research goes no where

And I have to start back at square 1.

Ok, the thing is. I'm not actually interested in conspiracies theories, because I understand how science works and I understand that it would be impossible to keep a huge conspiracy in the shadows.

@SighOperator Is that "Climate Change"

No one said anything about conspiracy theories?

@wheredowegofromhereQ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escolar

In fact I have only referred to fact finding missions.

If you ever want to do what we call a deep dive, send me a message. I'll go wherever the facts lead.

A scientist's reputation and credibility is based on the credibility of their work. If they put out a study that uses poor methods, some other scientist will point it out and the study would be discredited. The scientist who pointed out the poor methods would be highly respected.

Do not forget that first they called it global cooling then global warming and then since they were wrong on both they called it climate change that way no matter what the climate did they were right! .................But no they are wrong!

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1131318790564864001?s=09

<:PepeYay:539084299391991828>

<:PepeInterdasting:539084299727536128>