Message from @SighOperator

Discord ID: 580884579322429440


2019-05-22 22:17:44 UTC  

If a scientist makes a discovery that goes against the current consensus, and that research can be replicated by other scientists, then that scientist RECIEVES A NOBEL PRIZE.

2019-05-22 22:18:12 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/435869520998170624/580882130163466260/Pisgah_Inn.jpg

2019-05-22 22:19:35 UTC  

BS she is getting the hell out before SHTF

2019-05-22 22:19:37 UTC  

May will go Friday

2019-05-22 22:20:38 UTC  

Watch the video attached to the tweet. PARODY ADVERT lol

2019-05-22 22:20:48 UTC  

If a university suppressed research it would be a big controversy. It wouldn't go unnoticed.

2019-05-22 22:22:16 UTC  

The scientists who did the research would be like "Wtf, they suppressed our research." and they would report it to the world and their fellow scientists

2019-05-22 22:23:37 UTC  

1922 committee will meet Friday morn 10am 11:30/12:00 may will exit No 10 short speech go back into No 10 leave thru back door.

2019-05-22 22:24:40 UTC  

I love that the Whitehouse does not have a back door.!

2019-05-22 22:25:12 UTC  

"Downing"...and out!

2019-05-22 22:25:38 UTC  

LOL @SighOperator so true.

2019-05-22 22:26:07 UTC  

Mayxit?

2019-05-22 22:26:20 UTC  

ok, i'll stop.

2019-05-22 22:26:37 UTC  

Mayextradite it

2019-05-22 22:26:55 UTC  

Crap, I got one more that I heard earlier....

2019-05-22 22:27:08 UTC  

Go

2019-05-22 22:27:56 UTC  

With May resigning at the End of May, does that make some irony?

2019-05-22 22:29:18 UTC  

back

2019-05-22 22:31:00 UTC  

Well both female Prime ministers exited in may both with euro problems history re-repeating except I hope enough wake up tomorrow to end cycle

2019-05-22 22:34:47 UTC  

@Jayde So, your claim is that institutions are either suppressing research, or the scientists are supressing themselves because they want to get funding from the institutions, correct?

2019-05-22 22:37:04 UTC  

@tunacanman Thats easy to prove all the best young uni grads bail out to research then find a result that 8th grade could figure out

2019-05-22 22:37:18 UTC  

Its not just about funding.....but i get what you're saying. Yes, the scientists who bring relevant, legitimate but contradictory information are ousted to the fringes. They're blackballed from the community. They are known as "naysayers" "quacks" and "crazies" among a plethora of other colorful names.

2019-05-22 22:37:54 UTC  

@Jayde or arkancided

2019-05-22 22:38:03 UTC  

If you don't think that higher education doesn't center on greed and politics and career advancement you are not looking deep enough.

2019-05-22 22:38:43 UTC  

Again, you are only parroting to me what you've been TOLD.....not from any research you've personally done

2019-05-22 22:39:05 UTC  

The reason for that is because their methods are discredited. Science is not about opinion and group think. It's based on a rigorous process.

2019-05-22 22:39:22 UTC  

You are basing your entire argument on the premise that 97% CANT possibly be wrong.

2019-05-22 22:39:43 UTC  

Question and this is proven. What contributes the biggest carbon release on Earth ???

2019-05-22 22:39:56 UTC  

Daily

2019-05-22 22:39:57 UTC  

And Scientists are golden honorable stand up guys in a world of muck and deceit

2019-05-22 22:40:00 UTC  

Doesnt work that way.

2019-05-22 22:40:37 UTC  

No, they absolutely CAN be wrong! But currently 97% believe that with the current models we have, those models are pointing to serious consequences