If a scientist makes a discovery that goes against the current consensus, and that research can be replicated by other scientists, then that scientist RECIEVES A NOBEL PRIZE.

https://twitter.com/BreakingNLive/status/1131221254005022721

BS she is getting the hell out before SHTF

May will go Friday

Watch the video attached to the tweet. PARODY ADVERT lol

If a university suppressed research it would be a big controversy. It wouldn't go unnoticed.

The scientists who did the research would be like "Wtf, they suppressed our research." and they would report it to the world and their fellow scientists

https://www.wimp.com/article/a-unit-of-retired-u-s-navy-seals-and-police-detectives-are-working-to-save-children-from-sex-trafficking/?fbclid=IwAR03hyAMAd7JBSIy5x4I91zpW0L5nmFjPX9JRXaVOruqqA0vVgkOQGu3GbE

1922 committee will meet Friday morn 10am 11:30/12:00 may will exit No 10 short speech go back into No 10 leave thru back door.

https://youtu.be/VM8_q8yZKLI

I love that the Whitehouse does not have a back door.!

"Downing"...and out!

LOL @SighOperator so true.

Mayxit?

ok, i'll stop.

Mayextradite it

Crap, I got one more that I heard earlier....

Go

https://breaking911.com/just-in-u-s-army-vet-indicted-terror-plot-that-was-intended-to-inflict-mass-casualties/

With May resigning at the End of May, does that make some irony?

back

https://youtu.be/BOery4WCjDY

https://youtu.be/b1A0bwzGld0

https://youtu.be/5xL969fq4Tg

Well both female Prime ministers exited in may both with euro problems history re-repeating except I hope enough wake up tomorrow to end cycle

@Jayde So, your claim is that institutions are either suppressing research, or the scientists are supressing themselves because they want to get funding from the institutions, correct?

https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-wttj2yX-P94/U9Dik8hWgFI/AAAAAAAAFkM/2zUoHYAgB0k/s1600/Disney+'Brave'+3D.gif

@tunacanman Thats easy to prove all the best young uni grads bail out to research then find a result that 8th grade could figure out

Its not just about funding.....but i get what you're saying. Yes, the scientists who bring relevant, legitimate but contradictory information are ousted to the fringes. They're blackballed from the community. They are known as "naysayers" "quacks" and "crazies" among a plethora of other colorful names.

@Jayde or arkancided

If you don't think that higher education doesn't center on greed and politics and career advancement you are not looking deep enough.

Again, you are only parroting to me what you've been TOLD.....not from any research you've personally done

The reason for that is because their methods are discredited. Science is not about opinion and group think. It's based on a rigorous process.

You are basing your entire argument on the premise that 97% CANT possibly be wrong.

https://newsbreakinglive.com/2019/05/22/breaking-pentagon-proposing-plan-to-send-up-to-10000-more-troops-to-the-middle-east/

Question and this is proven. What contributes the biggest carbon release on Earth ???

Daily

And Scientists are golden honorable stand up guys in a world of muck and deceit

Doesnt work that way.

No, they absolutely CAN be wrong! But currently 97% believe that with the current models we have, those models are pointing to serious consequences