Message from @Decay
Discord ID: 531795233571078148
Odin tells me to rape Irish women
with my beer belly
Why would you rape an ape?
Yes, God bless America
what kind of liberty are we talking, liberty from our passions and primitive selves or liberty from others? Very different approaches and either way, yes and no.
Very vague question
Question from a skeptic to Christians, why do you believe in God/the Bible?
Question from a Christian to those of lesser morals, why do you not believe in God/the Bible?
based
@CpnNevosity
“I find your lack of faith disturbing.”
-Darth Vader
This isn't an argument.
that is right
There is no argument
God is real
atheists DEBUNKED
I think the point is that the question is redundant and doesnt get anywhere.
It doesn’t matter why we did, rather why you should.
You sure you meant ‘lesser’ morals, not alternative or other or...?
Liberty, much like the importance of defying gender roles, is mandated by god
@Abiss I meant lesser morals, everything is either right or wrong. If your morals guide you towards something which in reality is wrong as if it were right they are inferior to someone’s morals which aline with the truth.
it is god's authority to restrict human actions, not man made institutions - so yes it is
I'm laughing so hard at you, religious people.
@Victor Von Doom then it’s a loaded question that is going to eliminate a lot of non Christians from answering. The average non Christian doesn’t think they have lesser morals.
dear ***A T H E I S T S*** if **GOD** isn't *r e a l ,* how come ROCKS aren't **A N I M A L S Y E T ?**
atheists eternally BTFO
(I didn't get it)
rocks aren't animals because rocks are not biological, and evolution happens only with respect to biological creatures.
how the fuck didnt u get it
lmaoo
bro
I didnt get it either
Also when we talk belief and weight, atheists dont actually have a valuable position based on lack of evidence, there is a burden of rebuttle to be had otherwise neither side really has anything. so
B: I believe in god
A: What is your evidence for god existing
B: I dont have any, im making the assumption
A: Well then I will remain in my position that god doesnt exist which is an assumption itself.
The conversation here demonstrates that without actual logical arguments, evidence, or supporting logical statements neither actually has any more value, both are pointless. The discussion will usually always come down to either "thats not evidence" or "Thats a fallacy" However there is no actual counter evidence or logic.
(also beware the fallacy fallacy)
Basically the discussions most of the time are retarded and absolutely best suited to be practiced in causual debatish literally person to person discussions, because the moment things get heated nothing gets done no arguments are explored no evidence is actually presented.
Generally thats why i like to approach things purely scientifically, especially the paranormal or parapsychological phenomena, which do exist and have statistical significance, and work with our current models, generally our current models are just wrong but we assume them for the sake of practicality, and then theorize what could be going on. Its a much more coherent and neutral way to approach things, and should a parapsychological phenomena be proven true that is radical enough, it will force us to change our models for life itself and everything (currently im working on cellular consciousness or sentiennce for example as a little hypothesis i have based on the quantum mind theory)
and yay a pointless post
have a good one you chads
Why do you always have to write huge messages?
Nobody's reading them anyways.
@Koninos Cuz im basically using discord as a punching bag for all my anger and resentment at my studies because of the workload
its a decent escape
Interesting.
(If I had a punching bag then honestly id be training right now instead of writing posts)