Message from @Decay

Discord ID: 532275393034715175


2019-01-08 01:58:14 UTC  

Atheism

2019-01-08 01:58:27 UTC  

Don't you mean gaytheism

2019-01-08 01:58:36 UTC  

Right... So nothing

2019-01-08 01:59:47 UTC  

I explained to you why I'm not engaging you. You do not understand the larger impacts of events. Please (for the love of God) look into history and how events shaped events.

2019-01-08 02:00:16 UTC  

I mean, I have

2019-01-08 02:00:22 UTC  

Doubtful

2019-01-08 02:00:31 UTC  

Giving BJs hasn't really shaped global affairs

2019-01-08 02:00:42 UTC  

Do you know that

2019-01-08 02:00:42 UTC  

Or any forms of "minor/subjective" immorality

2019-01-08 02:00:54 UTC  

eg, dressing scantily, swearing, and so on

2019-01-08 02:01:35 UTC  

The death of this country will come from the ignorance of its people.

2019-01-08 02:02:42 UTC  

You can make the same argument for anything

2019-01-08 02:03:05 UTC  

"Do your own research, look into history and psychology - stop being ignorant"

2019-01-08 02:05:32 UTC  

It's not about being ignorant with a news story. It's about the awarness of the individual. You have demonstrated multiple times in this conversation that you do not see the larger picture. I wish you the best in your (hopeful) research of the world. I don't expect you to do it, cuz I'm some randomn person on the internet, but I hope you do. Best wishes, @Lord Tachanka

2019-01-08 07:00:09 UTC  

harmful?

2019-01-08 07:00:14 UTC  

hmmmmmmm

2019-01-08 07:00:20 UTC  

liberalism

2019-01-08 07:00:25 UTC  

that cult is dangerous

2019-01-08 09:21:18 UTC  

issue is morals are largely objective, as you even state there is a subset of morals that are objective, these morals pertain to our nature, hence wearing a skimpy outfit is something tha tgoes against that since its used to pbulicly seduce someone. Its directly provocative, and degenerate, by any objective standard this is what is happening.

No matter what moral system we choose it will always be imposed it is part of forming society, we agree on morals and the larger agregate has every right ot impose thos eon others. They have a right to live in a certain society, and drive out those who dont wish to conform. There is absolutely nothing morally wrong with that but rather good.

2019-01-08 09:22:02 UTC  

Harm is a terrible metric much like suffering for morality

2019-01-08 19:12:22 UTC  

<:this:487682424562647060>

2019-01-08 22:02:13 UTC  

"hence wearing a skimpy outfit is something tha tgoes against that since its used to pbulicly seduce someone. Its directly provocative, and degenerate, by any objective standard this is what is happening."

2019-01-08 22:02:14 UTC  

how?

2019-01-08 22:02:49 UTC  

It's not causing harm to anyone or anything

2019-01-08 22:03:21 UTC  

"it is part of forming society, we agree on morals"

2019-01-08 22:03:27 UTC  

No, no we don't

2019-01-08 22:03:38 UTC  

"Harm is a terrible metric much like suffering for morality"

2019-01-08 22:03:39 UTC  

howso?

2019-01-08 22:40:46 UTC  

If we only co sider harm i can mąkę the case for public nudity. I can also live on a trash bin and walk around smelling like shit. The point being that there is more to proper morał behavour than harm. For example behaviours that are unwanted but dont cause harm remain immoral. Seducing someone wife, her cheating on him. Its immoral and wrong yet no harm is actually being done.

The fact remains that a society forms around the Law which is i formed by morality, skimpy clothong for example is degenerate and immoral because it is a means by which to exert influence and power and spreas temptation and attempt to cause People to be have i morally. It is being slutty and that threatens proper gender relations, it takea away the idea that some tjings are scared and only to be given to some. Additionally you can be polygamous bwcause muh no harm. But at the same Time you b3come a walking std. The point being that your very state of existing is interconnected with the lives experience of other. They have a right to live in a society of standard that they choose. These standard are morally i formed and almost Universal. Any Man that has a Woman and is okay with her dressing sluttily is a beta cuck. Because i. Reality no Man is because of how xlear a provocarion that is. One could though arguebthat this kind of clothong promotes and causes distress.

2019-01-08 22:53:28 UTC  

"Seducing someone wife, her cheating on him. Its immoral and wrong yet no harm is actually being done."

2019-01-08 22:53:37 UTC  

I'd argue a violation of trust is a wrong

2019-01-08 22:53:52 UTC  

"proper gender relations" no such thing

2019-01-08 22:54:30 UTC  

"b3come a walking std." Sure, spreading STDs is immoral. If you're clean, no harm - also, lewd dress =/= boinking

2019-01-08 22:55:15 UTC  

"I can also live on a trash bin and walk around smelling like shit." still also different

2019-01-08 23:56:59 UTC  

Daily <@&516817984782729217> Question <:PraiseGod:484196233020440586>

Should religion be taught at schools if it is the nation's national religion? Should schools be able to choose if they teach it or not? Or should it not be taught at all?

2019-01-08 23:57:05 UTC  

Yes

2019-01-08 23:57:07 UTC  

no

2019-01-08 23:57:13 UTC  

No

2019-01-08 23:57:14 UTC  

no

2019-01-08 23:57:18 UTC  

And no, only teach Christianity

2019-01-08 23:57:30 UTC  

No