🤷‍♂️

so I see the connection

Tough shit then

Do you like Pinochet @killsometime

Pinochet is a discount Franco really

*shit

All I know about him is free helicopter rides

Libertarians are the creationists of economics

and communists are the flat earthers

Generally speaking once upon a time homosexuality was viewed as not normal, however few if any cared what happened behind closed doors. Most treated the public space as a common space where the majority is entitled to, through sheer force, force unity in identity and what values are propagated. Hence why today you cant for example fuck around and cause a riot or yell fire in a theatre. You also cant walk around naked.... which can be argued for just as much as homosexuality in the same way. Its discriminatory yes. But its the public space so the majority has the right to say no to certain behaviours that affect everyone. What you do individually does affect those around you especialyl in the public space, and people have a right to determine if that is unnaceptable or not.

Atheists and Creationists are equally terrible, they assert an answer in a unanswerable theoretical metaphysical question

Are people born gay? No, perhaps a few but most are not.

Should gay people have gotten the "right" to marry? No, it isn't marriage and they never actually wanted to be married.

Should gays be allowed to adopt children? NO, stop the degeneracy, protect the kids.

just to suit personal vendettas

@killsometime The purpose of laws isn't always to outright forbid something, sometimes they are written with the intention of fostering a certain culture

which is why "BUT IT STILL HAPPENS" is a meaningless retort

Last time I looked into it, I believe gays are overrepresented in child molestation by like 40 times.

I dont know about 40 times, but they are overrepresented

Today we see homosexuality used to create a new identity that is founded on what is assumed ot be an immutable trait, which creates a need to keep that identity alive and in fact secure its ability to project power, to secure its existence and those of its members. You do this trhough hate speech laws, diversification (essentialyl recruitment into the minority pile), etc. until you reach a status of legitimate cultural dominance. The idea of restricting this identity or in fact eradicating it is to incorporate gays into the identity of a certain culture and region and restrict friction within the group.

maybe 40 was one of the numbers used

and yeah its 11 gay pedo to 1 hetero pedo

^

thats not mentioning generally in proportion of population which can make it much higher

yep

Essentially my group dynamics thing rant is to say that the moment you get a gay movement going, they become a subversive group trying to establish themselves and seperate from society and seek to break down that society to secure their own existence. Which explains their import of muslims, and other minorities.

Their sexuality becomes their identity

which is the biggest problem

^

I understand that. The government shouldn’t dictate how the culture evolves though. It should happen organically with the people. Not have it forced by the government. Do I personally approve of gays? Not at all. So what? It’s not my problem what they shove up their ass. The whole “laws are sometimes written with the intention of fostering a certain culture” sounds like some shit that would be said in support of Prohibition. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t. I personally believe the job of the government is to govern and accommodate themselves to the culture as it evolves. Not change the culture of the nation to what the government wants.

it's all they think of themselves as

having an entire identity in sexuality is purely degenerate and nothing else

The intention of prohibition was noble, but the policy was stupid

it worked tho

its the same as people who pride themselves on doing nothing but drugs

Prohibition did not work

dropped liver cirhossis drastically

weed smokers, drunkards

alchoholism went down, it was never a good idea long term but it did work medically.

say had prohibition been relegated to a short span

well planned and executed

with the right medical facilities and all

rather than halfhazard and messy