A small authoritarian government with the explicit desire to serve and to see over the nation's people.

Think midget with a bazooka, not really harmful on it's own, but not a good idea to piss it off.

Pop quiz

Despite making up than less than one percent of the worlds population Jews absolutely dominate every important field with most key figures in media, finance, and academia being hardcore Jewish this fact is

A) pure coincidence (racist question)

B) a testament to their strong work ethic

C) the end game of their six thousand year long Talmudic Jewish conspiracy

I really dont want to say b, do im going to say c

Despite me hating jews, when they work they work, so I change my answer back to b

Too bad your answer was c and that’s a No you are racist and in fact your not even going to hear the answer because your so racist your career is over you are doxed you will never work in this town again The answer is a this fact is pure coincidence

Can you add commas to that?

never

Guess imma have to read the rules on u

So calling me racist?
Not in <#452955229227319306>?
Not using <#452955238186614794> for its use?

Without addressing my argument

Can I even warn?

Idk

!warn

-warn

.warn

i mean, he did address your argument, you're racist

When I chose c or when I changed to b.

?

Ive seen what you said in the bible nice try Jesus

I havent even read the bible

So what did I say?

Im curious

New testament or old?

New testament is like the star wars prequels.

you know i dont quite know

Oh

Ok

But what choice was racist?

B or C?

C

So im only choosing racist choices but I dont think them?

That all depends on you

But right then

When I chose it

@Enigmatic★Chromatic Your concept of nation and generally huma nhistory is flawed, to have a commonhistory, language, and culture you must necessarily have isolated populations. In the past we can check the DNA ad notice that modern descendants of original peoples were in fact genetically isolated. Jews are a perfect example of the fact that people literally dont interbreed.

Also ethno nationalism is redundant, Nationalism is defacto ethno nationalism. The french nation had its predecessors who were mostly from one family of tribes, who spoke a ocmmon language. For example Poland formed from the lechite slavic tribes, fun fact the kaszubians isolated themselves for os long that they frmed their own language and own genetic markers. A nation is literally an isolated people, an ethnicity. Because this also relates to the fact that identity is formed upon the pillars of immutable characteristics so unfortunately everything you said pertaining to nation is wrong. Both historically and scientifically.

" In China the dominant nation is Han Chinese with 54 other ethnic groups, many of which are given national self determination and autonomous regions" Literally undermines your entire premise.

I think you missed my point

Also the Jewish example is pretty bad since the Jewish people I imagine you're picturing are Ashkenazi, who have European ancestry. As opposed to Jews with Arabic ancestry for example

But France is made up of several tribal and racial ancestries. Even today we can see a map of different areas dominated by different majority racial background like Celts, North Germanic, Celto German and Greko Roman people just to name a few

Nations have never formed on a racial basis and never will, your conception is rather ahistoric

"Nations have never formed on a racial basis and never will, your conception is rather ahistoric" With few exceptions this is untrue, and itself is ahistoric. People unite based on common traits first and foremost, the genetics backs me up on this. I can once again cite the slavs, the scandinavians, the germans, bavarians, japanese, etc. The list of examples for my hypothesis is far greater than yours.

Its generally simply common traits, language, appearance, history, tribalism and in group bias. Its all hardwired into humans. hell even england is a prime example of this. England is primarily english, while ireland and scotland are celtic and the welsh are also something different, these groups are largely isolated and interbreeding is rare. Interbreeding only ever occured on a mass scale by actual force, and as such people united on these basic traits. Nationalism and nations are by nature tribal and of one ancestry not multiple. France did eventually unite its essentially conflicted peoples by essentially pointing far into the past ot their last common ancestor. Again this points to my hypothesis. And even then this union is temporary. I can go through history and demonstrate that veyr few things happened. 1) Nations form 2) nation takes over land and exterminates the natives 3) Nation takes over land and creates republics, no mixing occurs 4) Nations peacefully agregate and still dont mix

However we look at it Nations are not racial but ethnic. I reject the premise that nations were simply "muh culture" which somehow can be applied to multiple ethnicities even though it simply cant.

98% of jews are ashkenazi jews btw. or some % above 90. Which is suprising to be honest. I was expecting much more jews from outside of europe. However jews are peculiar in that they are a religious identity, however izrael most definately can described original and converted jews.