Message from @Prophect

Discord ID: 523918008129683458


2018-12-16 17:39:49 UTC  

Enigmatic why do you keep bringing up crises of over production in capitalism btw

2018-12-16 17:39:57 UTC  

I'm bringing up mass production because we need to mass produce

2018-12-16 17:40:07 UTC  

and while factories will possibly be reduced

2018-12-16 17:40:13 UTC  

they have to stay aswell

2018-12-16 17:40:13 UTC  

This gets more technical if we get into more detail for example glass factories need to be constantly moving or the glass cools and everything breaks meaning there is a minimum amount of glass bottles needing to be produced

2018-12-16 17:40:16 UTC  

as they existed in the soviet union

2018-12-16 17:41:03 UTC  

we need to mass produce to support the population btw I forgot to mention

2018-12-16 17:41:09 UTC  

The Soviet Union is a whole other thing

2018-12-16 17:41:17 UTC  

do you agree it was Socialist?

2018-12-16 17:41:30 UTC  

Depends on what you mean

2018-12-16 17:41:39 UTC  

how do you define Socialism

2018-12-16 17:41:56 UTC  

I have a fairly broad definition of Socialism

2018-12-16 17:42:01 UTC  

It had some sections of the economy that operated on socialist principles

2018-12-16 17:42:01 UTC  

as far as definitions go

2018-12-16 17:42:16 UTC  

I use socialism like Marx did

2018-12-16 17:42:23 UTC  

As interchangeable with communism

2018-12-16 17:42:40 UTC  

So no nation has ever been Socialist?

2018-12-16 17:42:45 UTC  

or communist except for Catalonia?

2018-12-16 17:42:57 UTC  

If I'm right, the most basic definition of socialism is:
The distribution of goods and money equally among the populace

2018-12-16 17:43:03 UTC  

Catalonia was less socialist than the USSR

2018-12-16 17:43:07 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/452955238186614794/523918008129683456/Facepalm.png

2018-12-16 17:43:15 UTC  

But socialism existed in the USSR

2018-12-16 17:43:48 UTC  

I don't think Socialism should strive for equality of outcome

2018-12-16 17:43:56 UTC  

But it's not a great example of what reaching a genuine stage of socialist production would look like, especially in the 21st century

2018-12-16 17:44:10 UTC  

Socialism isn't about equality at all

2018-12-16 17:44:15 UTC  

of course

2018-12-16 17:44:25 UTC  

It's about the abolition of class distinctions

2018-12-16 17:44:38 UTC  

I mean even in a socialist state class will exist to an extent

2018-12-16 17:44:53 UTC  

it will either be the political elite

2018-12-16 17:44:59 UTC  

and the non-political

2018-12-16 17:45:05 UTC  

I think it's a defining feature of socialism tbh

2018-12-16 17:45:14 UTC  

and we'll probably still have wealth inequality

2018-12-16 17:45:22 UTC  

just not to an extreme degree

2018-12-16 17:45:22 UTC  

Because production for use, the abolition of the commodity form and such are not uniquely socialist

2018-12-16 17:45:26 UTC  

(but what do you defind as class distinction? like social treatment or something?

2018-12-16 17:45:39 UTC  

Only common ownership and the abolition of class is uniquely socialist

2018-12-16 17:45:49 UTC  

it's hard to say Zusheng

2018-12-16 17:46:08 UTC  

we could use an economical view

2018-12-16 17:46:08 UTC  

Classes are defined by your relationship to production

2018-12-16 17:46:14 UTC  

like that

2018-12-16 17:46:18 UTC  

but even with that definition